That link posts to a new statement by the secretary backtracking from what she said earlier to rescue her boss Gov Cuomo. Obviously she was put up to it.
Obviously another assumption.
If there's an investigation, she'll be sworn to tell the truth, not some phoney press release that BS's the media and the public who really aren't fooled by it in any case.
If? You assume again, the press release is phony, or perhaps phoney. But whatever, as I've had to repeat and you've had to ignore, nothing you've provided backs up this being a reality:
Democrat gov Cuomo of NY created a situation where 13000 old people died of Covid because of his directives.
No, not even the NY Post stated that but instead:
The bombshell findings could push the DOH tally of 8,711 deaths to more than 13,000, based on a survey of 62 nursing homes that found the state undercounted the fatalities there by an average of 56 percent.
Again, you're confused between what is a legitimate need for clarity (the inaccurate death rate, the state
undercounted the fatalities) AND an
action you
believe resulted in 13,000 deaths. A belief you can't prove to others because it is just your belief based on (obviously

) assumptions. Again.
NO WHERE, in anything you've posted, because it's untrue and you can't find it, does it state that "
Cuomo of NY created a situation where 13000 old people died of Covid."
Did 13,000 die? At this time, that isn't under debate. Did 13,000 die directly
due to "
Cuomo of NY created this situation"? ZERO proof of such an assumption.
Enough said; when you have actual verifiable data, that Cuomo of NY created a situation where 13000 old people died of Covid, do provide it.