Just try reading and the comprehension of English before “reading between the lines” and as expected, assuming the meaning of the writings!
If someone
genuinely doesn't understand what I've written, I'll try to find a better way to make my meaning clear for them. I don't have a problem with that. But when someone
pretends not to understand, that's someone that will waste my time and I'm no longer interested.
I'm not going to reject a conversation with someone based on a perception of their knowledge or lack of it. Their sincerity or lack thereof is another matter. I'm happy to engage with people of differing opinions. I enjoy
honest debate with people who are
sincere in what they say.
For me, it's not a question of true or false; it's a question of whether I believe someone is being honest or dishonest in the way they interact with me. I'm not willing to waste time with people that
pretend not to comprehend, that
pretend to reply to what you've written but are replying to things that you've never said.
Whether I engage with someone isn't a matter of their intelligence, knowledge, judgement, or conditioned on agreeing with what I believe to be true or factual. It's their character that determines if I want to engage in conversation or not. I actually like some of the people with whom I've had many disagreements here. I may enjoy their wit or intelligence, but most of all I appreciate their sincerity — despite the fact that we may disagree on some matters.
I'm done interacting with anyone that
knowingly creates false pretexts and frameworks just to get a response. Let them bait someone else for the attention they seek. That hook is going to float on by from now on.