With recent threats against some Supreme Court justices about their Roe decision, how could you make that comment? ...
That's the kind of personal emotional threat I was getting at. Revolutionary movements attack power structures, the odd dead cop or civilian is just collateral damage, not the intended targets. Governments, for example, use that excuse all the time. Presumably this kind of behaviour is the kind of thing you'd otherwise condone though. You're the one who claims that, in part, the 2nd amendment is a way to arm people against tyrannical governments. That's the sticking point though, who gets to decide who is tyrannical and who isn't. The Weathermen thought it was their duty to resist. Did they have a right to bear arms? Of course, they were loonie-tunes but so are lots of militia goons, yet we think it's ok for them to come to demonstrations armed to the teeth. It's their right, we say. Well, ok, but.
The Alex Jones crowd so stalked and threatened a couple of the Sandy Hook parents that they had to move several times. That kind of personal threat, not unlike the kind aimed at the Justices, is in a league all its own. Not sure that falls under the category of revolutionary fervour.
