Yes, of course, it's a given that if everyone behaved responsibly there would be fewer problems. But you were the one who has said all along that the rebellious US population will refuse to be controlled. Ok fine, I get it, so what do you do then if you are the civil authority trying to prevent further contagion. At some point, if things get too hairy, you may have to shut down everything by force of law. How does that get you what you want?
You seem to approach everything from the point of view that individual personal freedom is at the top of the hierarchy. Some of the time it is, even most of the time, but sometimes it just isn't. One's personal desire to play a round of golf may not always be the most important issue. It doesn't strike me that not being able to play for a while is a very serious blow to personal freedom.
Sorry Rob, but this makes no sense.
Playing golf on a 100 to 200 acre park, essentially, by yourself or standing 6 yards from another person is a hell of a lot different then partying on a beach during Spring Break.
Using the moronic activities of Spring Breakers as a reason to shut down all activities, even ones with a near zero chance of spreading the virus, is either an act of total stupidity or some pathetic party ideological bull shit.
On top of that, Golfers are not going to interact with a litany of people during their game like a spring breaker would buying drinks and food. Most will just show up with their own bag, clubs, balls, glove, their own drinks (whatever that may be) and aside from paying the green fees will not talk to a damn person other then someone who is playing with them.
This is has already trekked into the realm of stupidity, and if it continues anymore, then yes, Americans are not going to pay attention to it. Especially considering we are all at home without any work getting bored out of our minds and antsy.
Seriously, you think you can take away all activities, pleasures and work from people, and then expect them to stay inside indefinitely? Dont be foolish.
