Theodoros,
You did not simply post a possibility - you posted a probability:
That there is no "this is incorrect" when one doesn't post a fact, stays... whether a possibility or a probability... "there is a strong possibility that..." is both a possibility and a probability as one would mean exactly the same if it was "it is probable that"...
If the likelihood of an outcome is small then asserting that there is a "strong possibility" of the outcome is incorrect.
Sorry... it doesn't work like that with the logic science (according to Aristoteles), it simply means that one
that doesn't use the system and thus has no way to confirm the fact, he addresses to others that do, as to ask them if that is the case (the statement "it might be that same size sensors are interchangeable between them, but the ones that are of different size are not" (different words used but exactly the same statement) does make perfect sense
and it is still a wonder)...
Back to the subject though... Having read reports from users that H3II backs are interchangeable with H4D ones (i.e. one can swap the backs between the camera bodies and still have them both working) , I would like to know if:
1. The same would apply with H3D backs,
2. If people have checked with different size sensors backs or only assumed that it is so by checking for backs that have same image size sensors.
There is a
strong possibility that the bodies have a build in interface that can correct for lens aberrations
for a specific size of sensor and thus, the interface would work the same for another back (of the same "family") that has the same image area size... However,
there is a probability that it also
possible that all H3/H3II/H4 camera bodies have build in multiple interface as to correct for aberrations on different size sensors and then automatically recognise as of which interface to use depending on the back (of the same family) attached.
