Topic: iridient 3 (Read 77130 times)

Lundberg02 · « **on:** March 03, 2015, 01:56:56 am »

released yesterday

dumainew · « **Reply #1 on:** March 15, 2015, 03:34:37 am »

Do you know if it can open Sigma FX3 files from a DP2 Quattro ?
Thanks.

ario · « **Reply #2 on:** March 15, 2015, 04:06:14 am »

The complete list of supported cameras is here:
http://www.iridientdigital.com/products/rawdeveloper_cameras.html
As far as I can see the Sigma DP" Quattro is not (yet?) supported.

dumainew · « **Reply #3 on:** March 15, 2015, 09:46:48 am »

Thank you.
I don't see it on the list either.
But I couldn't help hoping.
Richard

Tim Lookingbill · « **Reply #4 on:** March 15, 2015, 05:01:11 pm »

Quote from: dumainew on March 15, 2015, 03:34:37 am

Do you know if it can open Sigma FX3 files from a DP2 Quattro ?
Thanks.

Iridient Developer reads DNG files, so you might convert to that format if possible.

ario · « **Reply #5 on:** March 15, 2015, 11:01:57 pm »

Quote from: Tim Lookingbill on March 15, 2015, 05:01:11 pm

Iridient Developer reads DNG files, so you might convert to that format if possible.

None of the Sigma Merril cameras are presently supported by Adobe DNG Converter, to the best of my knowledge.

Plateau Light · « **Reply #6 on:** March 15, 2015, 11:10:24 pm »

Is it me or is there an unbelievable level of detail and low noise in the conversions that is a level above anything previously available?

ario · « **Reply #7 on:** March 16, 2015, 12:15:34 am »

You are not alone.

Plateau Light · « **Reply #8 on:** March 16, 2015, 01:00:14 am »

Quote from: ario on March 16, 2015, 12:15:34 am

You are not alone.

I have to think WTF is Adobe thinking? It's like they have the wool pulled over everybody's eyes.

AlterEgo · « **Reply #9 on:** March 16, 2015, 10:53:18 am »

Quote from: Plateau Light on March 16, 2015, 01:00:14 am

I have to think WTF is Adobe thinking?

Adobe is thinking about the bigger picture...

ppmax2 · « **Reply #10 on:** March 16, 2015, 01:55:42 pm »

Quote

Is it me or is there an unbelievable level of detail and low noise in the conversions that is a level above anything previously available?

Agreed. I went back and tried reprocessing a bunch of pics that I had used RawTherapee for (specifically for sharpening and noise reduction) and the results from Iridient 3 are amazing. Extra amazing, since it was so easy to achieve!

Nice work Iridient!

(PS: I have noticed 1 or 2 strange artifacts when using the Texture/Micro Detail setting...every now and then I get a few "hot pixels" that appear out of nowhere...setting this to 0 seems to take care of it, but it's strange artifacting nonetheless)

thx--
PP

digitaldog · « **Reply #11 on:** March 16, 2015, 02:41:46 pm »

Been a big fan since the old Raw Developer days dating back to 2006.
http://www.ppmag.com/reviews/200607_rodneycm.pdf

BernardLanguillier · « **Reply #12 on:** March 17, 2015, 07:17:05 pm »

Iridient Developper 3 is probably best in class at extracting detail while controlling noise.

The full size jpg image below was shot with a D810 and Otus 55mm f1.4 at... f1.4 (this is such an amazing lens).

I went for a very crisp rendering, some may prefer something a bit softer. This works really well in print.

Cheers,
Bernard

CoyoteButtes · « **Reply #13 on:** April 01, 2015, 05:34:20 pm »

Does anybody know where I might fine some commentary or information on working Iridient Developer into an existing Lightroom/Photoshop/Lightroom workflow?

Thanks in advance.

digitaldog · « **Reply #14 on:** April 01, 2015, 05:43:08 pm »

Quote from: CoyoteButtes on April 01, 2015, 05:34:20 pm

Does anybody know where I might fine some commentary or information on working Iridient Developer into an existing Lightroom/Photoshop/Lightroom workflow?

The only logical way I can think of is to use ID to render the raw, bring it into Photoshop if necessary and if you must include LR, it would only be for cataloging, printing the rendered data from ID. You've got a raw and one or more raw converters so pick the converter you prefer and move on.

howardm · « **Reply #15 on:** April 01, 2015, 05:46:54 pm »

google for the win

http://www.iridientdigital.com/iridientdeveloper/tutorials/IridientLightroomWorkflow.html

CoyoteButtes · « **Reply #16 on:** April 01, 2015, 08:41:09 pm »

Big help. Thanks!

jrp · « **Reply #17 on:** April 02, 2015, 07:48:14 am »

Looking on the net suggests that ID is a good processor for Fuji sensors. I don't use Fuji, so I never looked further.

This http://www.nomadlens.com/raw-converters-comparison comparison ranks Iridient developer alongside photo ninja, but behind DXO and Capture One. But "It is the clear winner in this review when it comes to extracting the maximum amount of detail from an image".

I haven't seen a way of using the Lightroom lens correction profiles with Iridient developer. Is that possible? It's such ancillary features, including local adjustments, and the easy workflow that keeps Lightroom in business, much as I would like the additional detail.

kirkt · « **Reply #18 on:** April 02, 2015, 08:47:25 am »

Quote from: jrp on April 02, 2015, 07:48:14 am

...
I haven't seen a way of using the Lightroom lens correction profiles with Iridient developer. Is that possible? It's such ancillary features, including local adjustments, and the easy workflow that keeps Lightroom in business, much as I would like the additional detail.

See attached.

kirk

jrp · « **Reply #19 on:** April 02, 2015, 09:54:59 am »

Author Topic: iridient 3 (Read 77130 times)