This guy is as dumb as a bang of hammers!
You will note in the description of the YouTube video, I said that probably the hottest debate in forums (outside of RAW vs JPG) is AdobeRGB and sRGB. I'm here, yes, absolutely because I wanted to see how hot this topic would get.
The debate between us (you, me and every single person expect Will) is you got your facts about color wrong. Then Will did. Simple as that.
I haven't seen an apology, but did I ask for one?
You don't deserve one, just the opposite. The people who's posts you deleted who tried to correct you deserve an apology. Your audience who is being misled, misinformed, given less than half truths deserve an apology
from you!Clearly you don't care about them, it's all about Fong.
The YouTube video is staying up, is getting great feedback because it contains useful (not irrelevant) information that the typical photographer can put to good use.
Useful to your marketing. If you really believed the feedback was useful how could you delete posts? That's called censorship Gary! It makes you look far worse than your totally confused understanding of color management.
Will Crockett has lectured nationwide, and is (alongside Eddie Tapp) the most recognized color expert among any of the top experts.
MacDonalds is recognized as selling the highest number of burgers. Doesn't make them the best by a long shot. I don't care if Will has lectured in every country on the planet, he's still wrong about a lot of color management theory. Distance between pixels? No output device has a gamut volume than sRGB? And your now famous illustration of spectrum where you state:.…And the colors at either side of the rainbow are the same." ALL WRONG.
I'm simply telling you that any individual in this group, or the group as a whole of its members, has absolutely no influence, anywhere.
You've told us all kinds of things that are wrong, here's yet another.
So while you may claim to be out "saving the world from misinformation" you have two obstacles: 1) nobody knows or cares about you and 2) you don't have a unified cause anyway. You all just argue with each other.
Point of fact, nearly everyone here and many on your site prior to your censorship
disagreed with you! That's another fact you simply can't recognize.
The typical photography enthusiast does not have a goal in life to wear a Coloritti blazer, or to purchase wide gamut monitors, or to make 3D animated diagrams of gamut balloons.
First, thanks for speaking for all typical photography enthusiast (out if your rear end), next it's
Coloratti, you've illustrated you can't read or write very well, lastly
3D gamut balloons is as ridiculous and an uneducated statement as Will's now famous "
distance between pixels" flop. The reason to keep the post open and allow you to write here is you get deeper and deeper into the hilarious color management comedy act you provide like no one else.
I have businesses to run. This is an important part of my business - illustrating the madness that ensues when a handful of color science experts (and not working photographers, as in the case of Andrew Rodney) get together in a forum and try to outwit each other.
If getting you to waste your time providing comedy material for us to read keeps you from misleading other's with new video's, this has been a worthwhile effort!
This is not what helps the industry. Read my articles on PDN about my yearly state of the industry.
How will that dismiss the incorrect teachings on color you've provided for all to see? It only makes some suspect of you which again, if only a few see that,this has been a worthwhile effort!
Intimidation of this kind discourages people from enjoying photography because you make them feel stupid, when they are not.
The only person who should feel stupid based on his writings about color is you sir.