The article is based on a CDC report dated January 28, 2022, so it's the latest data. I'm trying to follow the science. Don't you want me to? 
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/wr/mm7104e1.htm
Since when do you believe anything the CDC reports? Since when do you believe scientists? Did you cherry pick the parts of the report that agreed with you? Your track record on these things is not good.
As has been discussed before, there are viruses for which man-made vaccines that work better than "natural" immunity and there are those for which the opposite is true. This report, and I haven't read it yet so I'm taking your word for what it says, seems to indicate something about Covid. It's not clear to me if it covers all mutations, that is, might there be some for which this is not true. I may have time to look it over later but it does not look promising.
It's an interesting finding, but it's not necessarily something that calls for a change in our actions. If "naturally acquired" immunity works better than a man-made vaccine, but acquiring the disease kills a significant proportion of those infected, it might not help us much at all. But if the lethality of future mutations is greatly decreased, this might be good news.
With many colds and flus, we acquire natural immunity but it wears off quickly and the viruses change, so even if "natural" is better than "man-made", the advantage may be moot. It depends. Still, it may be another weapon in the arsenal.
In the future, please alert us if/when you are ready to accept the findings of scientists.