The Wisconsin Supreme court just yesterday said votes were likely case [cast] illegally.
No. The Supreme Court of Wisconsin did not say that "votes were likely [cast] illegally". It issued a final declaration clarifying conflicting interpretations of statutory language as it related to an "erroneous" interpretation by a county that was
corrected in March, at the beginning of pandemic restrictions, with a
preliminary injunction from the Court
prior to their April 7, 2020 primary election. That
preliminary injunction remained in effect and no votes were effected in the November 3rd presidential election by the earlier "erroneous" county interpretation of the statutory language back in March.
The case revolved around a county's interpretation, in March when the first pandemic restrictions were ordered, of the phrase "indefinitely confined" as used in multiple Wisconsin election statutes, sections, and subsections. The December 14th declaration by the Wisconsin Supreme Court simply made
final their interpretation of "indefinitely confined" as it was defined in their March
preliminary injunction. The Court did what courts often do; it took statutory language in one statute that
could be interpreted differently from the identical language in another statute and clarified the definition, interpretation, and application across all of the statues and their sections and subsections. The purpose of the declaration as stated in their opinion was to avoid repetition of any "erroneous" interpretation going forward.
You will find use of the word
erroneous several times in the opinions and declaration of the Court. What you will
not find are the words illegal or illegally
anywhere in the document. You will also
not find
any mention of votes, vote, or voters in either the majority opinion or final declaration; although those words do appear several times in the
dissenting opinions due to their concern over protection of voters rights.
The case is
Jefferson v. Dane County which was decided separately from
Donald J. Trump v. Joseph R. Biden both decided on the same day, December 14, 2020. In neither case does the Court say in their opinion, judgement, or declaration that "votes were likely [cast] illegally". The only time those words are used in either of the two cases is in
Trump v. Biden and there
only in discussing the
claims and assertions made by the Trump campaign and NOT in any findings of the Wisconsin Supreme Court which affirmed the decision of the circuit court in rejecting those claims.