willy nilly=without direction or planning, haphazardly
The video shows a guy who was protected behind a door. He moves his gun from one rioter to another before making an arbitrary "willy nilly" decision to shoot the woman who was still behind the door and a barrier in front of the door. Why did he shoot her and not one of the men? Did she seem more dangerous? Did he have problems with women? Was he a racist? Did he see a weapon? Was that his only option? Did he have a taser? Other defensive means? Were there other with him out of sight? If so, who? Why did the other guards who were protecting the door leave their position? Who told them to go? Why? There are a million questions that have to be answered. The point is the public and the family have a right to know what the investigation uncovered.
https://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/national-international/video-shows-fatal-shooting-of-ashli-babbitt-at-u-s-capitol/2491343/
"The video shows a guy who was protected behind a door." Yes. It's a freakin' door to the House Chamber where members were taking cover from the domestic terrorists trying to get at them.
"making an arbitrary "willy nilly" decision to shoot the woman" What a load of total
arbitrary "willy nilly" crap.
More total crap—plus a change in your narrative, another oft used tactic.
First it was "a shot
fired willy nilly
into the crowd" and
now it's a "willy nilly"
decision to shoot the woman". Make up your mind. Is it a shot fired "willy nilly" (
without direction/haphazardly) into the crowd or a "decision" and shot aimed at the woman coming thru the broken window frame? You do know that people notice when you're trying to wiggle out of previous statements, right?
More total crap..."the woman who was still behind the door and a barrier in front of the door." She was perched inside the broken window frame of the security barrier in the process of coming thru and being the first to breach it. Freeze the video just before the shot is fired (about 1:39 in the video you linked) (You can see it more clearly at 30-seconds into the video I linked because it doesn't darken when you freeze-frame). He fires
parallel across the
inside of the security barrier; not thru it. Think about getting an eye exam soon.
More total crap... "Why did he shoot her and not one of the men? Did she seem more dangerous?" Because she was first in breaching the security barrier and when that happened, he moved his attention and gun away from the broken doors, which had furniture thrown against them from the inside to keep them from being opened, and shot the first person coming thru the barrier. The entire mob was dangerous and at that moment, she was leading the breach thru the only security barrier left and which was directly in front of the the doors to the House Chamber.
More total crap... "Did he have problems with women? Was he a racist?" Too ridiculous to warrant a response.
"Why did the other guards who were protecting the door leave their position? Who told them to go?" Because they were standing directly in front of a violent mob with no helmets or tactical gear. They moved to make way for a well-armed tactical team at the top of the stairs which are clearly visible in the video (about 1:47 in the video you linked).
All of this information is readily available and you're determined to be blind to it. First, it was a phony comparison to police actions with George Floyd. Now, false assertions regarding what actually happened at the Capitol. You're tiresome in your false assertions and crap.
