If I jumped to a conclusion about your beliefs, I'm sorry. So let me just ask it as questions so you can clear up the matter.
Do you believe she should be treated similarly to Floyd? Should the public and her family be made aware of what the investigation of the circumstances are? Should a cop be granted the right to shoot and kill an unarmed person without having to explain and provide support for his action?
Floyd was lying on the ground handcuffed with a cop's foot on his throat. I don't know if that caused his death -- I guess we'll find out in the trial. The woman who was shot to death in the Capitol was leading a riotous mob who claimed to be hunting the speaker presumably to kill her...that's what it looks like to me and a lot of other fairly rational people, who have actually taken the time to look at the numerous tapes and to listen to what the mob was chanting...and she was crawling through the last barrier between the mob and its targets. So, I don't see a great deal of similarity there. And while the woman may have been unarmed, she was clearly engaged in a violent act including a clear attempt to overthrow the government, so yes, I think a cop has the right to oppose a violent act and a violent effort to overthrow the government, even with violence. We pay cops to make that judgment, and he made it, correctly IMHO. I actually think this whole question is racist -- the only reason it is asked is because one person was black and the other white, and so an attempt is made to conceal the speciousness of it in a false equivalency -- the black family get a reward, the white woman doesn't.
