Poll

Who do you think will be sworn in as President on Jan. 21?

Biden
- 14 (66.7%)
Trump
- 7 (33.3%)

Total Members Voted: 21

Voting closed: November 02, 2020, 06:25:59 pm


Pages: 1 ... 58 59 [60] 61 62 ... 194   Go Down

Author Topic: US Elections 2020 (geopolitics, informed debate, no ad hominems)  (Read 258734 times)

Ray

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10475
Re: US Elections 2020 (geopolitics, informed debate, no ad hominems)
« Reply #1180 on: August 26, 2020, 08:36:33 am »

I don't know. But I'm confident that the medical science advice that he gets will be from actual experts in their field and not some guy that hawks pillows on TV that's discovered a miracle cure or graduates from Dunning Kruger University that prefer to pontificate online instead of participating in peer review.

Don't you know that actual experts in their field frequently disagree on many issues? That's the nature of science, especially when the issue is complex and uncertain.
Logged

Peter McLennan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4692
Re: US Elections 2020 (geopolitics, informed debate, no ad hominems)
« Reply #1181 on: August 26, 2020, 09:10:12 am »

Don't you know that actual experts in their field frequently disagree on many issues? That's the nature of science, especially when the issue is complex and uncertain.

Yes, Ray.  We do know that.

Logged

jeremyrh

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2514
Re: US Elections 2020 (geopolitics, informed debate, no ad hominems)
« Reply #1182 on: August 26, 2020, 09:34:22 am »

Don't you know that actual experts in their field frequently disagree on many issues? That's the nature of science, especially when the issue is complex and uncertain.
Indeed, but just because experts disagree that's no reason to drink bleach, or whatever the nutters are telling us to do today.
Logged

kers

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4602
    • Pieter Kers
Re: US Elections 2020 (geopolitics, informed debate, no ad hominems)
« Reply #1183 on: August 26, 2020, 10:54:53 am »

Listening to the speakers ( shouters) at the Republican convention it will be Armageddon if Biden is chosen as president.
Fortunately there is a Trump alternative.
I can't remember it was Armageddon when he was vice president, I guess Obama reduced the danger during these 8 years.
Logged

Frans Waterlander

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1046
Re: US Elections 2020 (geopolitics, informed debate, no ad hominems)
« Reply #1184 on: August 26, 2020, 11:42:48 am »

Listening to the speakers ( shouters) at the Republican convention it will be Armageddon if Biden is chosen as president.
Fortunately there is a Trump alternative.
I can't remember it was Armageddon when he was vice president, I guess Obama reduced the danger during these 8 years.
Pity those who have eyes but cannot see.
Logged

kers

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4602
    • Pieter Kers
Re: US Elections 2020 (geopolitics, informed debate, no ad hominems)
« Reply #1185 on: August 26, 2020, 11:53:54 am »

Pity those who have eyes but cannot see.
Imagine ; being a photographer
Logged

PeterAit

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4647
    • Peter Aitken Photographs
Re: US Elections 2020 (geopolitics, informed debate, no ad hominems)
« Reply #1186 on: August 26, 2020, 05:31:11 pm »

The Illuminati?   Noooo, say it ain't so.

Better the illuminati than the illiterati  ;).
Logged

BernardLanguillier

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 13980
    • http://www.flickr.com/photos/bernardlanguillier/sets/
Re: US Elections 2020 (geopolitics, informed debate, no ad hominems)
« Reply #1187 on: August 26, 2020, 11:37:02 pm »

Listening to the speakers ( shouters) at the Republican convention it will be Armageddon if Biden is chosen as president.
Fortunately there is a Trump alternative.
I can't remember it was Armageddon when he was vice president, I guess Obama reduced the danger during these 8 years.

We are at a point where the Republican discourse is completely disconnected from reality.

When Trump looks at a sign where “yes” is written. He looks you in the eye and says “the signs says No”. And calls liers the media saying “the sign says Yes”. There is no more hope to have those guys deliver anything valuable ever.

The only question to me, that would separate them between idiots or monsters, is whether they believe their own lies.

So whatever they say about Biden, Michael Jackson or the Dalailama is irrelevant because they have made their speech irrelevant by deconnecting it from reality.

Cheers,
Bernard

Paulo Bizarro

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7522
    • http://www.paulobizarro.com
Re: US Elections 2020 (geopolitics, informed debate, no ad hominems)
« Reply #1188 on: August 27, 2020, 06:37:38 am »

We are at a point where the Republican discourse is completely disconnected from reality.

When Trump looks at a sign where “yes” is written. He looks you in the eye and says “the signs says No”. And calls liers the media saying “the sign says Yes”. There is no more hope to have those guys deliver anything valuable ever.

The only question to me, that would separate them between idiots or monsters, is whether they believe their own lies.

So whatever they say about Biden, Michael Jackson or the Dalailama is irrelevant because they have made their speech irrelevant by deconnecting it from reality.

Cheers,
Bernard

They live in their made up world. In the meantime, we have a boycot in the NBA due to the Blake shooting.

Ray

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10475
Re: US Elections 2020 (geopolitics, informed debate, no ad hominems)
« Reply #1189 on: August 27, 2020, 09:30:56 am »

Yes, Ray.  We do know that.

But how do you know which experts' advice to follow, whether you are a politician or not?
Logged

faberryman

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4851
Re: US Elections 2020 (geopolitics, informed debate, no ad hominems)
« Reply #1190 on: August 27, 2020, 10:11:13 am »

But how do you know which experts' advice to follow, whether you are a politician or not?

You seem like a bright guy. I suspect you have followed an expert's recommendation in the past and you are still alive, so I would go with whatever worked for you before. There is very little certainty in life, so you can only do your best, knowing that you and others will make mistakes.
« Last Edit: August 27, 2020, 01:35:35 pm by faberryman »
Logged

Robert Roaldi

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5514
    • Robert's Photos
Re: US Elections 2020 (geopolitics, informed debate, no ad hominems)
« Reply #1191 on: August 27, 2020, 10:40:04 am »

But how do you know which experts' advice to follow, whether you are a politician or not?

Ask Alan K., he worries about this a lot so he must have a best practice. :)
Logged
--
Robert

Alan Klein

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 15850
    • Flicker photos
Re: US Elections 2020 (geopolitics, informed debate, no ad hominems)
« Reply #1192 on: August 27, 2020, 11:13:51 am »

Ask Alan K., he worries about this a lot so he must have a best practice. :)
I check with my wife. :)

John Camp

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2171
Re: US Elections 2020 (geopolitics, informed debate, no ad hominems)
« Reply #1193 on: August 27, 2020, 12:29:08 pm »

Washington Post today:

"Trump has now visited his own properties 270 times as president, according to a Washington Post tally — with another visit planned for Thursday, when he is scheduled to meet GOP donors at his Washington hotel.
Through these trips, Trump has brought the Trump Organization a stream of private revenue from federal agencies and GOP campaign groups. Federal spending records show that taxpayers have paid Trump’s businesses more than $900,000 since he took office. At least $570,000 came as a result of the president’s travel, according to a Post analysis."

"In addition, campaign finance records have provided new details about the payments the Trump Organization received from GOP groups, as a result of the 37 instances in which Trump headlined a political event at one of his properties. Those visits have brought the company at least $3.8 million in fees, according to a Post analysis of campaign spending records."

A million here, a million there, pretty soon you're talking about real money.
Logged

Alan Klein

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 15850
    • Flicker photos
Re: US Elections 2020 (geopolitics, informed debate, no ad hominems)
« Reply #1194 on: August 27, 2020, 01:11:10 pm »

Washington Post today:

"Trump has now visited his own properties 270 times as president, according to a Washington Post tally — with another visit planned for Thursday, when he is scheduled to meet GOP donors at his Washington hotel.
Through these trips, Trump has brought the Trump Organization a stream of private revenue from federal agencies and GOP campaign groups. Federal spending records show that taxpayers have paid Trump’s businesses more than $900,000 since he took office. At least $570,000 came as a result of the president’s travel, according to a Post analysis."

"In addition, campaign finance records have provided new details about the payments the Trump Organization received from GOP groups, as a result of the 37 instances in which Trump headlined a political event at one of his properties. Those visits have brought the company at least $3.8 million in fees, according to a Post analysis of campaign spending records."

A million here, a million there, pretty soon you're talking about real money.
Well, I've offered my house.  But the White House says the president prefers his house.

Alan Klein

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 15850
    • Flicker photos
Re: US Elections 2020 (geopolitics, informed debate, no ad hominems)
« Reply #1195 on: August 27, 2020, 03:42:10 pm »

The Democrats are really worried. Looks like Biden doesn't want to show his senility.  They want Americans to vote for a mentally limited president. 

Pelosi says Biden shouldn't debate Trump
https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/27/politics/pelosi-biden-trump-debates/index.html

faberryman

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4851
Re: US Elections 2020 (geopolitics, informed debate, no ad hominems)
« Reply #1196 on: August 27, 2020, 03:52:53 pm »

The Democrats are really worried. Looks like Biden doesn't want to show his senility.  They want Americans to vote for a mentally limited president.

From the article you linked:

"Asked later Thursday on MSNBC if he would consider not debating Trump, Biden replied, "No. As long as the Commission (on Presidential Debates) continues down the straight and narrow as they have, I'm going to debate him."

"I know for certain, I'm gonna be a fact-checker on the floor while I'm debating him," he added.

Responding to Pelosi's comments, Biden campaign spokesman Andrew Bates said the campaign certainly agrees with the speaker's views of Trump's behavior.

"But just as she has powerfully confronted that behavior in the Oval Office and the Cabinet Room, Joe Biden looks forward to doing the same on the debate stage," Bates said in a statement Thursday."

« Last Edit: August 27, 2020, 04:00:39 pm by faberryman »
Logged

Alan Klein

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 15850
    • Flicker photos
Re: US Elections 2020 (geopolitics, informed debate, no ad hominems)
« Reply #1197 on: August 27, 2020, 03:57:39 pm »

Interesting that Trump's job approval has gone up - to 52% including 36% among Blacks and 37% among Hispanics.   Don't know how this translate to votes as he's still behind but not as much.  Also, 55% of Americans think that Biden is in the first stages of senility.  Considering he's only a couple of years older than me, that's not very comforting.  :o
https://zogbyanalytics.com/news/952-the-zogby-poll-new-trump-job-approval-numbers

Alan Klein

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 15850
    • Flicker photos
Re: US Elections 2020 (geopolitics, informed debate, no ad hominems)
« Reply #1198 on: August 27, 2020, 04:03:54 pm »

From the article you linked:

"Asked later Thursday on MSNBC if he would consider not debating Trump, Biden replied, "No. As long as the Commission (on Presidential Debates) continues down the straight and narrow as they have, I'm going to debate him."

"I know for certain, I'm gonna be a fact-checker on the floor while I'm debating him," he added.

Responding to Pelosi's comments, Biden campaign spokesman Andrew Bates said the campaign certainly agrees with the speaker's views of Trump's behavior.

"But just as she has powerfully confronted that behavior in the Oval Office and the Cabinet Room, Joe Biden looks forward to doing the same on the debate stage," Bates said in a statement Thursday."
Maybe Pelosi floated up a trial balloon to see how people would react and got too many negatives.  So Biden came back strongly affirming he'll be at the debate.  Or it's still a possibility.  Or, Biden will do OK in the debates, so they're figuring that would be a knockout against Trump who should not overplay his hand with Biden's possible incapacitates.

faberryman

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4851
Re: US Elections 2020 (geopolitics, informed debate, no ad hominems)
« Reply #1199 on: August 27, 2020, 04:25:30 pm »

Maybe Pelosi floated up a trial balloon to see how people would react and got too many negatives.  So Biden came back strongly affirming he'll be at the debate.  Or it's still a possibility.  Or, Biden will do OK in the debates, so they're figuring that would be a knockout against Trump who should not overplay his hand with Biden's possible incapacitates.

Maybe a lot of stuff. Or maybe not.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 58 59 [60] 61 62 ... 194   Go Up