Just really clutching to it, aren't you.
It's not enough every single model you have been siting has constantly been revised down even though they all took, expect for the very initial one, social distancing.
But anyway, you have already lost this Armand, and the reason I can say this is because every single grade AAA politician and governor is talking about re-opening, across the political spectrum.
Perhaps that is why Trump was talking as forceful as he was, to make sure he was the first person in front of the curve.
Yep, you won whatever you think. You are not interested on finding anything, only to win your alleged battles. In case you didn't figure it out, you were fighting this one alone. Or maybe you have some Don Quixote in you.
Funny how my peers are on the same page that this thing is working but the others who until few months ago had never seen anything like it, start doubting everything.
I can make a blog page on medium.com, throw in some statistics and you'll have no clue if what I'm saying is right. You'll care if it fits with what you want to hear.
Cutting funds to WHO now is criminal. End of story. Oh, so it wasn't the real lockdown? That's the same argument from the loonie left as "The real socialism has never been tried anywhere."
Or, for us who recovered from the coronavirus: "1. it wasn't the real Corona, just a cold or 2. you must have superhuman genes
Ok, so there is not enough data to conclude that the speed of lockdown is not correlated with the number of deaths?
But there IS enough data to conclude that the speed of lockdown IS correlated with the number of deaths when it comes to blaming Trump?
Are you guys serious!?
I'm talking about that post. I didn't say it's right or it's false, only that I would like to see it confirmed with other serious analysis. This is how good evidence work. You don't just throw a dance victory with the first bone that's thrown at you.
You can easily botch numbers and make it look right for your narrative. Should you look at when cases started instead of actual deaths (at least yet), should you look at how effective the lockdown was, should you look if people were actually practicing already social distancing before the official orders, are the numbers complete or just a snapshot, etc. Is that statistical analysis the right one to use for this?
I get it you want this in simplistic terms, I guess that's why Trump has such a good grab, but it's just not possible. Life is not 0 or 1. Unless you have tons of 0 and 1 to code it.
And regarding cui prodest. How reliable is this person to do this analysis? There are many just lying out there to get what they want. There was a recent medium.com post making a lot of false claims about Covid treatment; and enough people read it and started pointing the flaws, then suddenly the post disappeared. Don't be so gullible.