Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 9   Go Down

Author Topic: Brexit - shifting sands ?  (Read 27121 times)

Jeremy Roussak

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9262
    • site
Re: Brexit - shifting sands ?
« Reply #100 on: July 19, 2018, 04:24:10 pm »

Billion dollar question.
They either agree what is referred to as Norway+, or they go to WTO rules.

That's a dramatic oversimplification, as you well know.

Jeremy
Logged

Jeremy Roussak

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9262
    • site
Re: Brexit - shifting sands ?
« Reply #101 on: July 19, 2018, 04:25:44 pm »

Thank you, both all.  I really do enjoy reading your posts (Some, Slobodan, not all) [/levity] and hope the Mods take note and refrain from nuking a future Trump thread. Also hope that everyone feels free to comment and contribute here.

The Moderators Know Everything. Even before you post it. Beware.

Jeremy
Logged

Alan Goldhammer

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4349
    • A Goldhammer Photography
Re: Brexit - shifting sands ?
« Reply #102 on: July 19, 2018, 05:18:37 pm »

Alan, there have always been obligatory passport checks traveling to the UK via Chunnel or ferry.  I suppose they never signed the Schengen agreement (same with Ireland and Cyprus).
I knew they were not part of the Schengen agreement as we found out the hard way.  We had a trip scheduled for Croatia three years ago and they would not let my wife board the plane here in Washington.  Her passport was only valid for three months from the end of our trip which was only scheduled for 12 days.  Schengen countries require a passport with at least six months to expiry.  The weird thing was that the United Airlines didn't flag it when I entered the information into their web database but only told us at the airport.  It was our fault in the end for not being familiar with the passport/visa regulations.  We could have gone to the UK or Ireland as they only required a passport that was valid for the duration of the trip.  We learned a hard lesson that day and ended up forfeiting only one night hotel stay as we were able to cancel all the others. 
Logged

bassman51

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 142
Re: Brexit - shifting sands ?
« Reply #103 on: July 19, 2018, 06:18:34 pm »

Life is inherently unfair.



Life is not unfair.   “Fair” and “unfair” are concepts that don’t really exist in life.  Life just is.
Logged
Life is what happens when you're busy making other plans.

Alan Klein

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 15850
    • Flicker photos
Re: Brexit - shifting sands ?
« Reply #104 on: July 19, 2018, 06:36:45 pm »

I knew they were not part of the Schengen agreement as we found out the hard way.  We had a trip scheduled for Croatia three years ago and they would not let my wife board the plane here in Washington.  Her passport was only valid for three months from the end of our trip which was only scheduled for 12 days.  Schengen countries require a passport with at least six months to expiry.  The weird thing was that the United Airlines didn't flag it when I entered the information into their web database but only told us at the airport.  It was our fault in the end for not being familiar with the passport/visa regulations.  We could have gone to the UK or Ireland as they only required a passport that was valid for the duration of the trip.  We learned a hard lesson that day and ended up forfeiting only one night hotel stay as we were able to cancel all the others. 
Although it didn't matter in the end, Norwegian Cruise Lines flagged us with the 6 month requirement before our cruise to the south Caribbean Sea.  We had to expedite our passport renewals that cost extra money.  Here's a list of countries that have the 6 month rule.  Croatia isn;t on it.  But I suppose the rules change so I would get the renewal regardless of the countries you're visiting.

https://fastportpassport.com/blog/six-month-validity-passport-rule

Manoli

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2355
Re: Brexit - shifting sands ?
« Reply #105 on: July 19, 2018, 06:55:41 pm »

That's a dramatic oversimplification, as you well know.

Absolutely.
Alan Klein asked a simple outline question - considering the context, it's a reasonable recap (in a couple sentences) of the two most plausible eventualities.
But, please, do expand on the question.

Edit:
Opinion piece in The Guardian by Simon Jenkins:  "Don’t worry, a no-deal Brexit won’t be allowed to happen"

Quote
People at the coalface of the European economy cannot afford the posturing, vanity and idiocy of the Brexit parliament this past week. They have lives to live and mouths to feed. A closed border with the EU, not least in Ireland, would be like closing the Berlin Wall after it had reopened. There would be riots. That is why crashing out would not mean hard Brexit, but rather remain in all but name. When Brexit fantasy hits practical reality, reality will win.
« Last Edit: July 19, 2018, 07:39:20 pm by Manoli »
Logged

Alan Goldhammer

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4349
    • A Goldhammer Photography
Re: Brexit - shifting sands ?
« Reply #106 on: July 19, 2018, 07:20:28 pm »

Although it didn't matter in the end, Norwegian Cruise Lines flagged us with the 6 month requirement before our cruise to the south Caribbean Sea.  We had to expedite our passport renewals that cost extra money.  Here's a list of countries that have the 6 month rule.  Croatia isn;t on it.  But I suppose the rules change so I would get the renewal regardless of the countries you're visiting.

https://fastportpassport.com/blog/six-month-validity-passport-rule
We were flying to Frankfurt and then on to Zagreb.  You cannot land in Germany without six months on your passport.  That's why we were could not board.  We renewed both passports right away and also got Global reentry which allows you to get back in the country easily.
Logged

Alan Klein

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 15850
    • Flicker photos
Re: Brexit - shifting sands ?
« Reply #107 on: July 19, 2018, 07:31:47 pm »

We were flying to Frankfurt and then on to Zagreb.  You cannot land in Germany without six months on your passport.  That's why we were could not board.  We renewed both passports right away and also got Global reentry which allows you to get back in the country easily.

It's a good thing you got back before SCOTUS signed off on Trump's travel ban.  You might still be there.  :)

Alan Klein

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 15850
    • Flicker photos
Re: Brexit - shifting sands ?
« Reply #108 on: July 19, 2018, 07:37:42 pm »

Absolutely.
Alan Klein asked a simple outline question - considering the context, it's a reasonable recap (in a couple sentences) of the two most plausible eventualities.
But, please, do expand on the point.

Edit:
Opinion piece in The Guardian by Simon Jenkins:  "Don’t worry, a no-deal Brexit won’t be allowed to happen"

So Britain can make whatever trade deal it wants with the US?

Alan Klein

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 15850
    • Flicker photos
Re: Brexit - shifting sands ?
« Reply #109 on: July 19, 2018, 07:42:16 pm »

So Britain can make whatever trade deal it wants with the US?

When Brexit is done, can Britain and American sign off on the BRAMTA trade agreement whereby all trade between Great Britain and America will have no tariffs?  (BRAMTA is my name for it-  The BRitish-AMerican Trade Agreement)

Manoli

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2355
Re: Brexit - shifting sands ?
« Reply #110 on: July 19, 2018, 08:12:23 pm »

So Britain can make whatever trade deal it wants with the US?

It'll depend on the terms, if any, agreed with the EU. And not 'any trade deal it wants', but more probably a trade deal that Trump wants. In case you missed it, Alan - Junker is due in the USA in just under a week, in reality to continue trade discussions initiated by Obama.

Obama told the UK to 'stay', Trump told the UK to 'leave' - go figure, as they say across the pond.

Quote
Junker said he would seek again to explain to Trump that the European Commission coordinates trade policy for the 28-country European Union and that the United States could therefore not forge a trade deal with just one of its members.

“When it comes to trade, the European Union, its internal market, its single market, form an indivisible unity and it’s the Commission that is in charge of articulating trade policy. All efforts to divide the European Union are in vain,” Juncker said.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trade-eu/eus-juncker-upbeat-and-relaxed-ahead-of-trump-trade-meeting-idUSKBN1K81ZC
Logged

Alan Klein

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 15850
    • Flicker photos
Re: Brexit - shifting sands ?
« Reply #111 on: July 19, 2018, 08:20:24 pm »

It'll depend on the terms, if any, agreed with the EU. And not 'any trade deal it wants', but more probably a trade deal that Trump wants. In case you missed it, Alan - Junker is due in the USA in just under a week, in reality to continue trade discussions initiated by Obama.

Obama told the UK to 'stay', Trump told the UK to 'leave' - go figure, as they say across the pond.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trade-eu/eus-juncker-upbeat-and-relaxed-ahead-of-trump-trade-meeting-idUSKBN1K81ZC

I don't understand your post.  Once GB leaves the EU, it won;t be tied to its trade policies.  GB won;t be a member any longer.

Alan Klein

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 15850
    • Flicker photos
Re: Brexit - shifting sands ?
« Reply #112 on: July 19, 2018, 08:31:16 pm »

It'll depend on the terms, if any, agreed with the EU. And not 'any trade deal it wants', but more probably a trade deal that Trump wants. In case you missed it, Alan - Junker is due in the USA in just under a week, in reality to continue trade discussions initiated by Obama.

Obama told the UK to 'stay', Trump told the UK to 'leave' - go figure, as they say across the pond.



https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trade-eu/eus-juncker-upbeat-and-relaxed-ahead-of-trump-trade-meeting-idUSKBN1K81ZC



The linked article says that EU Trade head Juncker is going to the US to negotiate.  It says he's calm about the meeting. I doubt it.  I'm sure he's intuiting Trump's game plan. If the the EU doesn't agree to lower their tariffs, Trump will put American tariffs on EU cars before his jet lands in Europe. Then the CEO's of VW, BMW and Mercedes will tell Merkel to stop the nonsense and drop EU 10% tariffs on cars.  The funny thing is he's meeting Larry Kudlow one of Trump's trade advisors.  Larry hates tariffs.  Go figure.  Politics make strange bedfellows. 

Martin Kristiansen

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1527
    • Martin Kristiansen
Re: Brexit - shifting sands ?
« Reply #113 on: July 20, 2018, 01:45:39 am »

Life is not unfair.   “Fair” and “unfair” are concepts that don’t really exist in life.  Life just is.

Finally!
Logged
Commercial photography is 10% inspiration and 90% moving furniture around.

Manoli

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2355
Re: Brexit - shifting sands ?
« Reply #114 on: July 20, 2018, 03:13:18 am »

If the the EU doesn't agree to lower their tariffs, Trump will put American tariffs on EU cars before his jet lands in Europe. Then the CEO's of VW, BMW and Mercedes will tell Merkel to stop the nonsense and drop EU 10% tariffs on cars...

Just wondering, Alan, if you're aware that both BMW, VW and Mercedes manufacture some of their models in the USA. Mercedes even had a tie-up with Chrysler (not sure if they still do ). BMW with the 'Mini' and variations of the X series, Merc with the C and GLS class and VW the Passat and Atlas.

Quote
The reality: BMW is America’s biggest car exporter

What Trump apparently didn’t know is that BMW Group (the umbrella for BMW, Mini, and Rolls-Royce) is a model for exporting cars from the US. The BMW factory in Spartanburg is BMW’s largest facility in the world, with the most volume: 411,171 BMWs built there last year, versus 365,204 BMWs and Minis sold in the US. Nobody exports more cars from the US — not Ford, not GM, not the Chrysler arm of Fiat Chrysler Automobiles: 287,700 BMW vehicles last year, or 70% of production, and 3.7 million vehicles since the plant opened in 1996.

Every BMW SUV (except the subcompact X1) is built in one factory – Spartanburg — then shipped to the 140 countries where BMWs are sold. Mercedes builds SUVs and compact C-Class cars at a factory in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, and is building a factory for Sprinter vans in Charleston, SC.

Logged

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 25118
Re: Brexit - shifting sands ?
« Reply #115 on: July 20, 2018, 03:36:50 am »

Just wondering, Alan, if you're aware that both BMW, VW and Mercedes manufacture some of their models in the USA. Mercedes even had a tie-up with Chrysler (not sure if they still do ). BMW with the 'Mini' and variations of the X series, Merc with the C and GLS class and VW the Passat and Atlas.


Regardless of tarrifs on those "quality" cars such as Mercedes and BMW, those already able to purchase will sigh, and carry right on to the next model whenever it comes out.

We are not talking selling to the Ford Fiesta crowd (moi) here, but to folks who can buy whatever the hell their hearts desire. Hiking the price just raises the desirability and satisfaction quotient. Some might even feel more exclusive because of it.

Jeremy Roussak

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9262
    • site
Re: Brexit - shifting sands ?
« Reply #116 on: July 20, 2018, 03:43:20 am »

It'll depend on the terms, if any, agreed with the EU.

I don't understand your post.  Once GB leaves the EU, it won;t be tied to its trade policies.  GB won;t be a member any longer.

It's perfectly simple. If the terms agreed with the EU have an impact on the ability to deal with other countries, for example by allowing for regulations made in the EU to apply in the UK, then Britain will remain restricted by those terms. Deals are not done in isolation.

Jeremy
Logged

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 25118
Re: Brexit - shifting sands ?
« Reply #117 on: July 20, 2018, 04:58:42 am »

It's perfectly simple. If the terms agreed with the EU have an impact on the ability to deal with other countries, for example by allowing for regulations made in the EU to apply in the UK, then Britain will remain restricted by those terms. Deals are not done in isolation.

Jeremy


Jeremy,

Thank you for reiterating what I have been attempting to communicate, to the same person, until the snap! moment arrived, when it became too tedious to continue.

I hope you have greater success than did I.

(If there is one positive to emerge from my encounter, it's that it reinforces my belief that, like photography, conversation is often best practised entirely on one's own! In the end, it often comes to much the same thing.)

;-)

Rob

jeremyrh

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2514
Re: Brexit - shifting sands ?
« Reply #118 on: July 20, 2018, 05:10:20 am »

Absolutely.
Alan Klein asked a simple outline question - considering the context, it's a reasonable recap (in a couple sentences) of the two most plausible eventualities.
But, please, do expand on the question.

Edit:
Opinion piece in The Guardian by Simon Jenkins:  "Don’t worry, a no-deal Brexit won’t be allowed to happen"

Agree with your one-line summary but ... that article is utter garbage. Some things can carry on with no deal - planes can fly, trucks can roll, but other things will not happen - jobs for EU nationals, retirement houses for expats in Spain, because those things require the legitimacy of laws and confidence in a long term stability.

The country seems to have been utterly ****ed by the personal ambitions and ideologies of a few over-grown schoolboys. I despair.
Logged

Alan Klein

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 15850
    • Flicker photos
Re: Brexit - shifting sands ?
« Reply #119 on: July 20, 2018, 08:23:22 am »

It's perfectly simple. If the terms agreed with the EU have an impact on the ability to deal with other countries, for example by allowing for regulations made in the EU to apply in the UK, then Britain will remain restricted by those terms. Deals are not done in isolation.

Jeremy
Thanks for clearing it up. 

So Trump's comment to May, "You can do what you want." is his unhappy acknowledgement that GB will do and arrange Brexit with the EU however they need too.  Prior to that,Trump was trying to pull GB away to negotiate with us directly.  It would have been a wedge against the rest of the EU.  It would also help us with tariffs with other non-EU countries like China especially as it would be the first crack in the tariff wall.  I guess May told him that it would probably be impossible  for GB to make that deal with the EU during Brexit because Britain can't afford not to be able to trade with the EU countries.

Of course, if they take on the same tariffs as the EU, they will be treated the same way as the EU.  So US tariff would be applied to BRitish products as well as the EU's.  So he will negotiate with the EU primarily at that point.  If by chance, GB does not have to follow the EU with tariffs, then we will negotiate a direct deal with Britain.  The EU will follow Britain.
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 9   Go Up