I gather by this statement that some senior members were "gifted" a year's membership, correct? I think this is the first that I've seen this statement (correct me if I'm wrong). What was the criteria here? Number of posts? If so, that's problematic as there are some who have posted a lot of dross.
Damn right!
So much so, that I suggest we start an Occupy LuLa movement, organize street protests and do not stop until the disgraced management resigns. After all, they've proven, time and again, they have no clue how to run a successful photo site.
We then proceed to run the site ourselves, managed by a committee (Goldhammer committee? Ironhammer committee? Hammer & Sickle committee?) to ensure PC values are adhered to and an inclusive and safe environment created for all.
Speaking of which, high time for the landscape privilege to end. There are many other minority genres who feel threaten, isolated, abused and neglected, thanks to the landscape brutality.