How many times have I explained that the use of analogies like, "wide rainbows" or "muffin tops" were used to help people make a simple distinction about which to choose? How many times have I explained that changing the monitor profile was an illustration to show what happens when wide gamut is expressed in narrow gamut equipment?
Gary, you wouldn't need to point it out at all if you handled criticism differently. You are essentially saying that you have introduced inaccuracy in the name of simplification to help people. Fine — I don't think it's necessary in this case, but it happens all the time. However, when someone points out the inaccuracy, what's your response? It's to tell them they are wrong and know nothing about the subject. For example:
You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. Cyan green getting clipped? those colors are in the center of the spectrum. Why do people who know nothing about photography try to act like experts?
If you had simply said, 'yes, thanks I know, you are right, this is a simplification to make it very easy for everyone,' there would be no issue.
But, based on your comments on the videos, especially the one about greens not clipping, I think you actually believe (or believed) these models accurately represent the world. I can't imagine why else you would defend them so staunchly.
Now that's it's quite clear how wrong you and your simplifications are, what's your response? To call people names like 'colorbator.' It's like being in grade school again, where if you were bad at math you simply called the people who understood it names like 'nerd' rather than trying to get help. It's a classic defense mechanism; most of us grow out of it.