OK we made prints! There was a visible difference in the AdobeRGB file printed on AdobeRGB dry process. The AdobeRGB had richer saturation, visibly richer saturation. The AdobeRGB printed on sRGB of course had duller colors, as one would expect. So, in order of color richness, it was 1)AdobeRGB, 2) sRGB and 3) AdobeRGB on sRGB.
This is exactly what I expected, as I mentioned in the video. The AdobeRGB is the choice IF you have the equipment to express it. To go further,
We also did a number of web tests with both Windows and Macs. At the lab, they had a wide gamut monitor, and I have a Mac Thunderbolt monitor. On Safari for Mac, AdobeRGB looked better than sRGB, but on Windows it looked worse. On Firefox and Chrome on both formats, the AdobeRGB looked worse.
We're now doing tests on our mobile devices and uploads to Facebook. I will do a video on YouTube to show all of these results.
One thing that is probably going to drive people crazy is that if a photographer wants to show their images in the best presentation, there almost should be a button on their websites to redirect to the "Safari for Mac" version of the website, because as far as I can tell, it is the only color aware browser.
Windows Safari says it is, but the AdobeRGB image looked visibly more dull.