Wonder if my experience with our 4900 and 9900 extended warranties is truly aberrant, or is this a theme:
March 2013
1) 4900 2 year warranty purchased. Online registration of warranty is not offered, so the warranty card is mailed to Epson, as we are directed to do. Three months later the machine requires a total replacement, so I phone Epson Preferred Customer Support: "We have no record of your 4900 warranty purchase." Two hours later, after multiple calls and scans sent vie email, they agree I do have an extended warranty and that they much have lost the warranty registration. Two hours into the experience, they are for the first time willing to begin discussing what's wrong with my machine and, ultimately, a few days later I have a new refurb machine that, also, requires service to operate out of the box. Eventually, all is well.
Yesterday:
2) 9900 looses 3 nozzles abruptly. Time to cash in on my warranty purchase, which was registered months ago through the typical US Postal mail process. I phone Epson Preferred Customer Support: "We have no record of your 9900 warranty purchase." "This is BS", I say and "I've been through this with you before", I add with irritation. But this time it's worse: One and a half hours into my phone call, it is discovered that Epson's email service is not working, and this is why the scans of the warranty purchase I am emailing during the support call are not being received by the agent. I kid you not: Epson's email is down, so they won't even begin to discuss with me what's wrong with the 9900, let alone get a service ticket written so I can receive a site visit from Decision One. I'm told to try again today - "hopefully our email will be fixed and we'll have received your extended warranty proof that we must have lost. Then we can hear about what's wrong with your 9900 and get the investigation process started."
Aside from being pure HS, and irritating beyond, I can't help but feel this represents a deliberate stall on Epson's part to control costs. The idea that US Postal mail is the only means of proving warranty purchase, and that online registration is not allowed, is very suspect in my mind. A few years ago, Apple did not register Applecare purchased at the same time a new Apple computer was purchased. Twice, Apple had "lost" my Applecare registrations when it came time to redeem warranty work. I wrote a letter of complaint to Apple insisting that there was no possible explanation for an Applecare plan purchased with a new machine to not be automatically tied to that machine at the moment of purchase. Ultimately Apple did change their practice as a consequence of multiple similar complaints.
I am not given to conspiracy theories. This experience with Epson is unacceptable, either way, but have you encountered anything similar?
John Caldwell