Pages: 1 ... 73 74 [75] 76 77 ... 137   Go Down

Author Topic: Without Prejudice 2  (Read 572130 times)

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1480 on: April 03, 2016, 05:32:13 pm »

À propos of not a lot in particular, but probably inspired by recent events on the news:



Rob C

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1481 on: April 03, 2016, 05:34:31 pm »

Did some shots today with a young actor friend, for her book. This one I rather liked

Can't fool me: it's an actress!

;-)

Rob C

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22814
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1482 on: April 03, 2016, 06:03:23 pm »

Can't fool me: it's an actress!

;-)

Rob C
I guess it takes an experienced pro to tell the difference.   ;)
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1483 on: April 04, 2016, 04:32:45 am »

I guess it takes an experienced pro to tell the difference.   ;)


All you need is love a good Dick Tracy kit! With that, I am able to see anyone who commits a crime as if they live in a world made of glass. I marvel at these pre-digital techno-wonders.

;-)

Rob

GrahamBy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1813
    • Some of my photos
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1484 on: April 04, 2016, 10:06:31 am »

Can't fool me: it's an actress!

She promised to come to the studio (err, the room where I have a flash) and do some nudes. I'll advise.
Logged

petermfiore

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2705
    • Peter Fiore Fine Art
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1485 on: April 04, 2016, 11:29:50 am »

She promised to come to the studio (err, the room where I have a flash) and do some nudes. I'll advise.

Let us know how that line works in France...

Peter

drmike

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 988
    • On Flickr:
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1486 on: April 04, 2016, 11:34:35 am »

She promised to come to the studio (err, the room where I have a flash) and do some nudes. I'll advise.

A flash what? My mind is not boggling. I have supreme self control.
Logged

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1487 on: April 04, 2016, 03:54:30 pm »



Rob C

GrahamBy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1813
    • Some of my photos
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1488 on: April 04, 2016, 05:36:25 pm »

Oh, very nice :)
Logged

GrahamBy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1813
    • Some of my photos
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1489 on: April 04, 2016, 05:40:45 pm »

A flash what? My mind is not boggling. I have supreme self control.

I should hope so, a doctor and all.

Is there a policy here on nudity, btw?
Logged

Chairman Bill

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3352
    • flickr page
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1490 on: April 04, 2016, 05:49:20 pm »

Is there a policy here on nudity, btw?

No selfies. Kate Beckinsale would be fine though

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1491 on: April 05, 2016, 05:11:03 am »

Nude policy: AFIK, the policy seems to be - thankfully - that nudes are just fine, but anything pornish is not.

IMO, porn defeats the objective of nude photography, which I imagine to be the preservation against time of transient beauty. Whether or not concepts of beauty change over time, the point remains that I think we are, or probably should be, trying to record and conserve for ever, how wonderful something once looked. And the subject can't, of itself, do that for too many years.

I don't think there's validity for confusing nude photography with medical.

On a tangent: isn't it strange how some can become so stressed out about the matter: after all, every sister, mother, grandmother has the same basic equipment below the cotton, nylon, wool or whatever. The only difference is that some have it in a beautiful format and others not. Are the cries of the latter to defeat the joy of the former?

Rob C

GrahamBy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1813
    • Some of my photos
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1492 on: April 05, 2016, 09:50:50 am »

... waits for comments about colour management....
Logged

GrahamBy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1813
    • Some of my photos
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1493 on: April 05, 2016, 09:55:19 am »

My favourite definition is that porn is what other people like, erotica is what I like.

Anyway, this is Grace C. Jones, another actress (I'm fairly sure), and a very lovely person :)
Logged

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1494 on: April 05, 2016, 10:59:00 am »



Sorry, the temptation was just too great  ;D

Fuerteventura? Ibiza? By the weed, I'd imagine the Med rather than Atlantic. Maybe it's volcanic rock, in which case Atlantic. Either way, you know what to tell colour critics! Love the hair... I used to have about as much. (Depression? Who's depressed? High shine is good!)

;-)

Rob C

muntanela

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 687
    • BRATA
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1495 on: April 05, 2016, 01:04:22 pm »

Crocus vernus subsp. albiflorus (Kit.) Ces.
« Last Edit: April 05, 2016, 01:07:58 pm by muntanela »
Logged

Jeremy Roussak

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8961
    • site
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1496 on: April 05, 2016, 02:35:03 pm »



Sorry, the temptation was just too great  ;D

That's a photograph, not a selfie. Even if it is of you.

Jeremy
Logged

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18090
  • When everyone thinks the same, nobody thinks
    • My website
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1497 on: April 05, 2016, 02:43:57 pm »

But, but (hmmm... should double "but" be written twice or simply with a double "t"?) Jeremy, you could have made your point without double posting the butt image  :D

Chairman Bill

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3352
    • flickr page
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1498 on: April 09, 2016, 03:34:22 pm »

One from early evening today

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5540
    • Photos
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #1499 on: April 11, 2016, 10:34:40 pm »

.
Pages: 1 ... 73 74 [75] 76 77 ... 137   Go Up