Pages: 1 ... 135 136 [137]   Go Down

Author Topic: Without Prejudice 2  (Read 583173 times)

John R

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5248
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2720 on: June 13, 2017, 11:14:26 am »

Thanks John

I had to google Orton treatment.

Lightroom settings for this image:

exposure +20
contrast +80
highlights -100
shadows +82
whites +14
blacks -4
clarity -73
dehaze +8

In the detail panel sharpening, masking & noise reduction settings are high. ( Shot at ISO 6400, about as high as I can go on my camera ).

Graeme
After you posted your settings, I think I know what created the 'orton' effect. It's the combination of dehaze and clarity. Never use those as I seldom use Lightroom or PS. Lovely image- and effect is perfectly suited for the subject matter.

JR
Logged

muntanela

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 687
    • BRATA
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2721 on: June 20, 2017, 01:34:56 am »

Geum reptans L., Pian del Lago, Western Grosina Valley.
Logged

Chairman Bill

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3352
    • flickr page
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2722 on: June 23, 2017, 06:43:48 pm »

A less than exciting-sounding field of potatoes

BobDavid

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3311
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2723 on: June 26, 2017, 04:13:41 am »

Unedited. And corny.
Logged

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22813
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2724 on: June 26, 2017, 08:33:43 am »

Unedited. And corny.
But Minimalist, and therefore, by definition, Good.   ;)
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

graeme

  • Guest
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2725 on: June 26, 2017, 06:11:19 pm »

Unedited. And corny.

I like it. BW version?
Logged

graeme

  • Guest
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2726 on: June 26, 2017, 06:12:46 pm »

Another one from Cragside.
Logged

BobDavid

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3311
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2727 on: June 28, 2017, 12:59:22 am »

I like it. BW version?

Being it's jpg out of the camera, I'm looking forward to working with the RAW file in PhotoShop. I am 1,600 miles away from my workstation. So stay tuned; this photo will reappear...
Logged

GrahamBy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1813
    • Some of my photos
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2728 on: June 28, 2017, 11:01:30 am »

A less than exciting-sounding field of potatoes

Surprisingly impressive photo then :)
Logged

Chairman Bill

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3352
    • flickr page
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2729 on: June 28, 2017, 03:53:50 pm »

Surprisingly impressive photo then :)

Thanks. I'd rather be photographing dogwoods along the Merced River, but potatoes in Somerset will just have to do. Ansel Adams never had to suffer like this for his art :-)

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 24308
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2730 on: July 02, 2017, 06:36:11 am »



Rob C

Christopher Sanderson

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2701
    • photopxl.com
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2731 on: July 02, 2017, 09:33:39 am »

I noticed this morning that 13 pages of this thread - 'Without Prejudice 2' have been deleted. This was not an Admin action, so I need to ask if this was intentional on the part of someone or a mistaken thumb twitch. I would like to re-instate those pages.

I suppose it is also possible that the thread has become too long for the forum software. I have opened Without Prejudice 3
« Last Edit: July 02, 2017, 10:45:11 am by Chris Sanderson »
Logged

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 24308
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2732 on: July 02, 2017, 02:46:42 pm »

I noticed this morning that 13 pages of this thread - 'Without Prejudice 2' have been deleted. This was not an Admin action, so I need to ask if this was intentional on the part of someone or a mistaken thumb twitch. I would like to re-instate those pages.

I suppose it is also possible that the thread has become too long for the forum software. I have opened Without Prejudice 3

Certainly not on my part, Chris, though I did attempt to post a picture today. It appeared at half its proper size; should have been 810 pixels wide, so as it looked far too little to make sense, I deleted that post, but only that one.

I haven't been posting much recently, so there wouldn't have been any of my stuff I'd want to remove. I sometimes do a cleaning out of old images of my own, because they just take up LuLa space and serve no further useful purpose on the site. However, I usually do leave the written part of the post to posterity.

Rob

Christopher Sanderson

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2701
    • photopxl.com
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2733 on: July 02, 2017, 03:00:39 pm »

Thanks Rob!

I will attempt to put back the multiple pages that were deleted this morning (it looks like a major database glitch), so you may have to housekeep over again...

Christopher Sanderson

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2701
    • photopxl.com
Re: Without Prejudice 2
« Reply #2734 on: July 02, 2017, 03:04:19 pm »

Locking this topic now. Please head to Without Prejudice 3
Pages: 1 ... 135 136 [137]   Go Up