Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: Which point and shoot ?  (Read 6031 times)

eronald

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6642
    • My gallery on Instagram
Which point and shoot ?
« on: November 11, 2010, 04:02:49 pm »

As the subject says, which point and shoot or compact mirrorless are you guys using?

Edmund
Logged
If you appreciate my blog posts help me by following on https://instagram.com/edmundronald

Christoph C. Feldhaim

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2509
  • There is no rule! No - wait ...
Re: Which point and shoot ?
« Reply #1 on: November 11, 2010, 04:22:02 pm »

Canon Powershot G11 - I wish I had the S95 ...

jeremypayne

  • Guest
Re: Which point and shoot ?
« Reply #2 on: November 11, 2010, 06:12:25 pm »

As the subject says, which point and shoot or compact mirrorless are you guys using?

Edmund

I'm gonna buy a Canon s95.  I owned a G9 and loved it.

RAW + Pocket = Winner.
Logged

cyberean

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 161
Re: Which point and shoot ?
« Reply #3 on: November 11, 2010, 07:55:17 pm »


i only use point, compose and shoot cameras
...
Logged

arashm

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 145
Re: Which point and shoot ?
« Reply #4 on: November 11, 2010, 10:18:19 pm »

I use an S95 for daily carry around
Love it, can't wait for C1 to support the Raw files (what's taking so long :) )
The best part of this camera is you get decent files from it and can still keep it in a front jean pocket.
that's my vote...
am
Logged

shutay

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 203
    • http://www.asiaphotohub.com/Jason/
Re: Which point and shoot ?
« Reply #5 on: November 12, 2010, 12:35:37 am »

Olympus PEN E-P1.

Very pleased with it, but manual focus isn't easy if you should need to use it. If it had a bigger sensor, but kept all the features like live view, it'd be a killer MFDB.
Logged

Zenny

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22
Re: Which point and shoot ?
« Reply #6 on: November 12, 2010, 02:55:15 am »

On rare occasions, Canon IXUS 915S and camera from my PDA
Logged

Ken Bennett

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1797
    • http://www.kenbennettphoto.com
Re: Which point and shoot ?
« Reply #7 on: November 12, 2010, 07:55:07 am »

Panasonic GF1 with the 20/1.7 for general carry. Great image quality, easy to carry over one shoulder.

For a tiny camera, the Panasonic ZS1, which is a 25-300mm equivalent, image stabilized, etc. Makes a great hiking camera. Image quality is on par with most p+s cameras (that is, not so great, but acceptable.)
Logged
Equipment: a camera and some lenses. https://www.instagram.com/wakeforestphoto/

Dick Roadnight

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1730
Re: Which point and shoot ?
« Reply #8 on: November 12, 2010, 09:58:40 am »

Panasonic GF1 with the 20/1.7 for general carry. Great image quality, easy to carry over one shoulder.
This was the conclusion of:

Click to see Topic "Quality Compact to complement MF"

I think I will buy one soon, with the big zoom and the 20/1.7.

Anything better on the market now?
Logged
Hasselblad H4, Sinar P3 monorail view camera, Schneider Apo-digitar lenses

Jack Flesher

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2592
    • www.getdpi.com
Re: Which point and shoot ?
« Reply #9 on: November 12, 2010, 11:29:03 am »

GF1 with 20/1.7 -- outstanding pocketable carry all the time cam, and then a G2 with the 14-140 zoom.  UI and files from both/either are impressive for a small cam.  (Admission: I actually shoot raw+jpeg with these, and cannot remember the last time I bothered processing a raw file from them -- the in-cam jpegs are that good if you take the time to tweak the "film style" settings to your taste.  FWIW, for B&W I use "Dynamic" and dial sharpening and contrast back -1.  For color, I use "Standard" and increase saturation +1.)
Logged
Jack
[url=http://forum.getdpi.com/forum/

bcooter

  • Guest
Re: Which point and shoot ?
« Reply #10 on: November 12, 2010, 11:38:24 am »

I'm not a street photographer or point and shoot guy, but I own the GF1 and Leica M8.

I find the technical results virtually equal with these two camera.  

Working them in post they look like the images came from the same camera.

Regardless:

I find the artistic results with the Leica 1000% better and I can't tell you why.



BC

Logged

Ken Doo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1079
    • Carmel Fine Art Printing & Reproduction
Re: Which point and shoot ?
« Reply #11 on: November 12, 2010, 11:41:31 am »

GF1 with 20mm f/1.7 or 14-45mm.  Just a great fun camera...

JV

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1013
Re: Which point and shoot ?
« Reply #12 on: November 12, 2010, 11:48:49 am »

This might get quite boring but also the GF1 with the pancake lens,
looking to additionally buy the GH2 once released...
and the new Voigtländer 25mm f0.95 lens...
Logged

JV

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1013
Re: Which point and shoot ?
« Reply #13 on: November 12, 2010, 11:54:01 am »

I'm not a street photographer or point and shoot guy, but I own the GF1 and Leica M8.

I find the technical results virtually equal with these two camera.  

Working them in post they look like the images came from the same camera.

Regardless:

I find the artistic results with the Leica 1000% better and I can't tell you why.



BC



Just out of curiosity, are you using the Leica lenses on the GF1?
Logged

bcooter

  • Guest
Re: Which point and shoot ?
« Reply #14 on: November 12, 2010, 12:58:19 pm »

Just out of curiosity, are you using the Leica lenses on the GF1?

It may be me, but if you shoot for a few hours with that little panasonic, with the world's most unintuitive controls, then pick up the leica it's like having 200lbs lifted off your back.

I tried the Leica lenses on it, but it makes no sense trying to hand hold and focus a manual focus lens while squinting at an lcd on the back of a camera and I honestly couldn't see much difference.

I think  people buy the Panasonic because it's small and oh yea, it also shoots ok video, but I don't think it really excels at anything.

IMO

BC
Logged

fredjeang

  • Guest
Re: Which point and shoot ?
« Reply #15 on: November 12, 2010, 01:45:57 pm »

Perhaps wait for the Fuji X100?
But be carefull of the sensor cleaning. Those cameras like the Dp1 I own, the Leica X1 and the Fuji are not tropicalized and dust will araised at one pont or another and it is anoying really because the only way is sending it back, wait and pay. This is a burden when it happens. For the kind of imagery you are doing, I recommend you to try one of those DP series, specially the DP1x.
With the distance, I think having direct access to the sensor is important. The Fuji is indeed "very good looking", but you may will have more for the money with one of these m4/3, and no dust hassle. IMO.
« Last Edit: November 12, 2010, 01:52:26 pm by fredjeang »
Logged

Guy Mancuso

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1133
    • http://forum.getdpi.com/forum/index.php
Re: Which point and shoot ?
« Reply #16 on: November 12, 2010, 02:07:37 pm »

G2 today but ask me next week and it maybe different. LOL

Been switching things up lately in regards to 35mm and P&S .
Logged
[url=http://forum.getdpi.com/forum/showt

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Which point and shoot ?
« Reply #17 on: November 12, 2010, 02:32:46 pm »


I find the artistic results with the Leica 1000% better and I can't tell you why.

BC




Maybe it's because you instinctively take the Leica more seriously at the time of shooting?

How can you not be aware of the photo-heritage that rides on that name the minute you pick it up? I guess you can't disassociate yourself from that regardless of the other tools in your box.
 
I've never owned a Leica because work meant an slr was the way to go, but that never stopped me thinking it would have been nice to have one if they had been cheaper in terms of a system; who'd buy one with just a single optic, quickly followed with why buy a system you're not going to use to earn your living?

Which reminds me: I need to see a dentist; broke a filling some months ago and never seem to get around to thinking about it at the right time of day. Wonder why I thought of dentists?

;-)

Rob C

John.Murray

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 886
    • Images by Murray
Re: Which point and shoot ?
« Reply #18 on: November 12, 2010, 02:34:03 pm »

G9 - Just purchased used, loving it so far....
Logged

fredjeang

  • Guest
Re: Which point and shoot ?
« Reply #19 on: November 12, 2010, 02:55:33 pm »



Maybe it's because you instinctively take the Leica more seriously at the time of shooting?

How can you not be aware of the photo-heritage that rides on that name the minute you pick it up? I guess you can't disassociate yourself from that regardless of the other tools in your box.
 
I've never owned a Leica because work meant an slr was the way to go, but that never stopped me thinking it would have been nice to have one if they had been cheaper in terms of a system; who'd buy one with just a single optic, quickly followed with why buy a system you're not going to use to earn your living?

Which reminds me: I need to see a dentist; broke a filling some months ago and never seem to get around to thinking about it at the right time of day. Wonder why I thought of dentists?

;-)

Rob C
I think the Leica rangefinder system is the cause.  What really is extraordinary is the capacity to see out of the picture area when framing, so there is a sort of "personal involvement" if I might say that is unique to the Leica. In a dslr viewfinder you are stucked into 4 walls, in the Leica you breathe, you embrase more of the scenery and this has some consequences on the composition, the momentum.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up