The level of distortion of the 24XL and the 28HR is very similar according to the graphs.
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=100588\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
I found 24XL to be a bit more distorted then 28HR, but anyway not the world of a difference.
It is imperative that I learn how to read the MTF charts properly, so if anyone could send some links or advice on the literature, books etc. i would appreciate it.
I found one article here on Luminous Landscape, perhaps few more could help.
The benefit of the 28HR :
Higher resolution (important for 33MP +39MP) and it's sharp at F4.5.
+ you have a little bit of shift,however it's expensive and heavy.
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=100588\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
Why am I going for the H3D 39, e75, P45+ if not for resolution, so of course the benefit of the higher resolution lens is important. The question is, is there a
visual difference to justify the cost, or is the difference apparent only when you look at the MTF Charts.
Thanks to your info on weight: How heavy is the 28HR? perhaps a bit bulky for ALPA 12SWA, but I presume nothing that I should worry about.
The 24XL needs to be stopped down to F11 to get optimum sharpness.
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=100588\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
I know Rehnniar own's 28HR, do you own 24XL or 28HR?
REGARDS
Danijela