Greetings Kers,
Frankly, the GFX with the array of lenses I have is excellent and the cost of entry is very reasonable compared to the Hasselblad system!
I ordered all of my gear from B&H and tested lenses for sharpness before accepting them.
Now the given is that I have done almost all my work as B&W, but over the last couple of years for some reason, I'm enjoying color more and
more, and have decided to focus on it for what time I have left. I prefer by a small margin the RAW out of the box colors of any Hasselblad camera.
Couple that with the fact that I shot film and then digital almost all of my life with Hasselblad gear, until the GFX which I do enjoy.
However, I'm now 77 and I am entitling myself to one last crazy "Tool" (that is code for "Toy"") before I kick the bucket.
Rather than a fancy or classic 57 Chevy convertible, or full classic like a Packard, it's getting back to color on what I shot most of my life, a Hasselblad.
Last one I had was the H5C-50 WiFi. Sold it when GFX came out after testing it as I felt it was just as good and far less expensive.
GFX also has far more features I had never worked with. Also thought I wanted to do more general work, not just landscapes, that has not manifested.
Now, GFX with 3 lenses, I just can't haul it around as I can no longer hike due to health. Target is one body, one or two lighter lens now.
Last, there is a romantic element, I love HNCS colors.
Add to that, I consulted with Nikon, Leaf (now Phase), and Hasselblad in
developing their first digital cameras due to my lessons learned at Eikonix.
Yes, decades ago, but seems fitting now that the X1D/X2D has been around for a couple of years so most bugs should have been
resolved and I want to end shoot the "Hassie"
My last "Toy" syndrome. Just that simple.
Long answer!
Never ask an Ole Man "Why"!
Jack