But of course, Dr. TechTalk above has made his analysis, a guy who won't even give his first name and has never posted one photo he's ever taken in a photo forum he practices medicine in. But we should trust his analysis as to the efficacy of the J&J vaccines and skip the second dose of Moderna. Gee thanks, but no thanks.
I haven't made any "analysis as to the efficacy of the J&J vaccines". I linked to an article with the actual clinical trial data and quoted sections from its Q&A. The only thought I expressed was that the advice to take the first vaccine that became available to someone was sensible, based on simple common sense regarding risk. If that's what you regard as "analysis", it sets the bar for that word awfully low.
I have never thought or suggested that anyone should "skip the second dose of Moderna". That's your false assertion about me, which you first attributed to "They", and which frankly, I am failing to appreciate. Of course, "They" are always suspicious and up to nefarious deeds.
I gave facts about the difference between efficacy and effectiveness of vaccines, which you ignore. I also provided information regarding how variants can have an impact on efficacy in clinical trial data and on the longer term overall effectiveness of various vaccines, which you ignore. If you don't want to acknowledge basic facts and information regarding vaccines, that's your decision. You can then focus your attention on how suspicious and untrustworthy "experts" (or those you sometimes simply refer to as "they") are instead.
As for your false or misleading statements regarding anything that I have or have not advocated, I'd like to say... "Gee thanks, but no thanks."