Not really, but good to know. Because the danger is twofold: to get infected and to die from it. Those two risks combined give 0.016%.
My point was that the number 0.016 does not mean much. The only number we sort of "know" is approx 7% of 500,000 or 35,000 deaths of under 55s. The ratio of 35,000 to 220 million means nothing. You need to know the total number of under 55s that have been
infected, and that's not 220 million. Your number is not a meaningful snapshot in time. (For example, the day after patient zero showed up, the overall infection rate was 1 in 350 million, another low but meaningless number.)
According to Worldometer, the US has had 29.5 million cases in total as of this morning. I'm not confident that number is very accurate since it probably doesn't count all the folks who had it with no symptoms at all and so were never tested. As a ballpark though it's nowhere near 220 million yet.
As a reminder, 35,000 is not far off the average annual number of total flu deaths in all categories. Hence, my statement that it is not a negligible number.