Bear Pit: now the sole domicile of politics at LuLa

[Craig Lamson]

Writing under a pseudonym has never altered what was written, the veracity, its value, or even its lack thereof. How sad that you pretend not to understand that fact.

Yea it’s perfect for writers of fiction...

[Craig Lamson]

I'm quite happy with posting online behind an alias.

I’m sure you are.  It takes such courage and conviction.

[digitaldog]

Actually no.  Every effort has been rejected.  That does not mean the evidence of possible fraud has been disproven in every case.

This from a fellow who hasn't provided any data of evidence of election fraud. So, actually yes, that's one major reason they have ALL been rejected, NO evidence of wide spread voter fraud that would have any impact on the huge number of votes Biden got over Trump (7 million plus).
Meanwhile, we know you're not an anti waxer of boats. But “Anti-vaxxer”? You afraid to go on record and answer the question?
I already know you've never shot a boat as large as I provided in a studio but I believe without any evidence (because this is the game you're playing), you've waxed boats that large. 

[Craig Lamson]

This from a fellow who hasn't provided any data of evidence of election fraud. So, actually yes, that's one major reason they have ALL been rejected, NO evidence of wide spread voter fraud that would have any impact on the huge number of votes Biden got over Trump (7 million plus).
Meanwhile, we know you're not an anti waxer of boats. But “Anti-vaxxer”? You afraid to go on record and answer the question?
I already know you've never shot a boat as large as I provided in a studio but I believe without any evidence (because this is the game you're playing), you've waxed boats that large. 

How “widespread” does fraud need to be to overturn the results of a few key states?  How many votes were effected by big tech censorship?  We know that happened, no dispute.  How about big media not making news available or covering for Biden. We know that happened no dispute.   How many?

Are you so stupid that your pimping the popular vote again.  It seems to be the case. 

Exactly what have you been “waxing” today while sitting at your computer?

[LesPalenik]

How “widespread” does fraud need to be to overturn the results of a few key states?  How many votes were effected by big tech censorship?  We know that happened, no dispute.  How about big media not making news available or covering for Biden. We know that happened no dispute.   How many?

Are you so stupid that your pimping the popular vote again.  It seems to be the case. 

Exactly what have you been “waxing” today while sitting at your computer?

Actually, what I find highly suspicious is all the votes for Trump. Half of them must be illegal. It's hard to believe that there would be 70 million Americans voting for such an individual.
 

[digitaldog]

How “widespread” does fraud need to be to overturn the results of a few key states? 

More than the other candidate lost; so for Trump, overall, more than 7 million.  IF you can find 700, do so.

How many votes were effected by big tech censorship?

I don't answer rubbish questions that have no basis in fact.

We know that happened, no dispute.

We? You and Alan?

How about big media not making news available or covering for Biden.

I don't answer rubbish questions that have no basis in fact.
Big media (whatever that's assumed to be) didn't hold a gun to anyone's head to vote for Trump or Biden.

We know that happened no dispute.

 
We? You and Alan?

Are you so stupid that your pimping the popular vote again.

Are you so stupid to not see Biden won far, far more votes AND the Electoral College? Seems you are. We know that is true, no dispute. 
So, “Anti-vaxxer” it seems.

Exactly what have you been “waxing” today while sitting at your computer?

More assumptions as expected. I don't sit at a computer, I stand. I recommend a Veridesk. Been using one for years.
https://www.vari.com/?gclid=CjwKCAiAlNf-BRB_EiwA2osbxTFNa4a0qbRPaz3Th2LYt1zAqQ8qBVXjeigId1ssKN-5x1572FKw2BoCghsQAvD_BwE

[Craig Lamson]

What are some more outlets that got access to the hard drive? Maybe I left out Breitbart. Possibly Infowars.

And what exactly is "the issue" that they got wrong? I read up on this back in October, and even suffered through Tucker Carlson's interview of Bobulinski at Craig's urging. My take-away was that if you believe Bobulinski, Joe Biden lied when he said he didn't talk to his son about his son's business affairs, and if you believe Joe Biden, Joe Biden didn't lie when he said he didn't talk to his son about his son's business affairs. Maybe there was something more.

I believe the WSJ got it too, but Rudy stated if you wanted to check out the drive you could do it at his office.  Who knows maybe Rudy shut them off after saying it was Russian disinformation and Rudy was compromised by Russia.    I know you actually followed the story, and since you did I’m not understanding your questions about how the MSM failed to do and what they got wrong. It was a story American should have heard and they were denied my the MSM.

Yea I would say there is plenty more.  Hunter under multiple investigations, Joe’s brother too.

[digitaldog]

I believe the WSJ got it too, but Rudy stated if you wanted to check out the drive you could do it at his office.  Who knows...

The last part is SO telling. We know that no dispute.

[chez]

Actually, what I find highly suspicious is all the votes for Trump. Half of them must be illegal. It's hard to believe that there would be 70 million Americans voting for such an individual.
 

Yep...if there is fraud...I'd be looking at the republicans rather than the democrats.

[TechTalk]

My opinions are well informed...  You are a sheep.

I'm not indicating my judgement is superior to anyones

Safety Note: Suddenly shifting your mind into reverse may cause serious damage to the transmission.

[TechTalk]

Clean your weapons and load the magazines...

I'm quite happy with posting online behind an alias.

I’m sure you are.  It takes such courage and conviction.

Whether you're posting commentary online or suggesting cleaning your weapons and loading the magazines online, neither require any courage or conviction. The ability to recognize and write logical and coherent sentences is helpful, however.

[pschefz]

Actually no.  Every effort has been rejected.  That does not mean the evidence of possible fraud has been disproven in every case.

Actually no. Every claim of voter fraud has been rejected because no evidence was presented.
Possible fraud can not be disproven.
Every court (now up to the Supreme Court) has thrown out the presented cases for lack of merit and or lack of evidence. Most of the judges in charge haven been appointed by Trump.
There is no case here....at all. Georgia had to recount 3 times now, it did not change anything. The officials are mostly republicans, some are Trump voters.
The whole voter machine fraud "case": Trump won most counties where these machines were used!
We all knew for months that every state has different rules when it comes to how and when to deal with counting votes. We knew that those who believe in Covid being real would not vote in person (like actually, Trump) and those who think Covid is a hoax would line up and DO vote in person, which, depending on the state would lead to numbers going this way and that for a while. Everybody knew that, trump went to court to fight the procedure and courts ruled. these rules were in place BEFORE Election Day.
There is nothing going on here. The deep state, dead Venezuelan leader, Trump nominated Judges, FBI, CIA, Anitfa and (actually a good part of the Republican Party) including the rest of the entire sane universe MASSIVE conspiracy does not exist.

 

[TechTalk]

Despite four years of harassment and assaults,  70 million people still understood what was going on and voted for Trump.  The rest supported the chicanery for political reasons or were ignorant of or bamboozled by the whole charade.

Despite four years of Trump's lies, harassment, and assaults on anyone that didn't idolize him, 81 million people understood what was going on and voted for Biden.  The rest supported his chicanery for political reasons or were ignorant of or bamboozled by the whole charade.

[faberryman]

Attorney General Bill Barr may not make it to Christmas.

"Attorney General Bill Barr has reportedly compared Donald Trump's attacks on him as a “deposed king ranting" after the president apparently raised the possibility of firing him."

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-election-2020/bill-barr-trump-election-biden-b1772174.html

That "deposed king ranting" comment is probably not going to go over too well with the lame duck.

[Robert Roaldi]

There was a funny piece in the Canadian satirical site, The Beaverton, that's the one that Slobodan doesn't like. The story headline was, "Desperate Trump demands recount in New Brunswick".

[Robert Roaldi]

I'm not sure what the "fringe sites" got right and the "trusted sources" got all wrong about "the Hunter Biden story". I am not even sure what "the Hunter Biden story is". Rudy Giuliani, the New York Post, The Daily Caller, and whomever else allegedly has them have not released the thousand of emails, photos, and videos that they claim are on Hunter Biden's laptop hard drive image, including in particular the videos of Hunter Biden sexually abusing underage Chinese girls. When they do so, I'll be interested in reading about it.

I suggested almost two months ago that if the DOJ thinks they've got something on Hunter Biden, they should appoint a special counsel and look into it. I doubt Joe Biden would fire a special prosecutor.

To be fair, they might be holding back on the stuff from Hunter's hard drive until 2024.

[Peter McLennan]

Hey dufus, blow it out your behind...

Eloquent, as always. /s

The courts: "Show us one shred of evidence, just one, that Tr*** lost the election due to voter fraud and we'll consider it."

But no.

Over and over and over again, ad nauseum. Court after court, hearing after hearing, for weeks.  And what? Nothing. Zero. SFA. Yet <insert usual suspects here> continue to "believe".  Except Slobodan, who's run for the hills.

And the golf games continue, the tweets spew and Americans continue to die. Thousands of them.  Every single day.

That ANYONE, let alone some seventy million people, would vote for this asshole is beyond understanding.

I repeat myself, sorry:  "easily gulled"   

[faberryman]

Here’s a case in a trial court in Wisconsin where a Trump appointed judge gave Trump's attorneys the opportunity to present fact witnesses, and they didn’t present any. And it was not some outlier. The article appears in the National Review of all places, so it is not just the addled brain ravings of the commie/lib media. As Joe Friday would say, just the facts, ma'am.

https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/12/a-stunning-passage-from-the-latest-court-rejection-of-team-trump/

[Alan Klein]

AOC checking out an ICE detention center.

[James Clark]

VOTER FRAUD!!!!!  STOP THE COUNT!!!!

if this isn't proof, I don't know what is.  Right now the liberal Bezos Post is reporting on the electoral college vote, and as you can see, PRESIDENT TRUMP has so much WINNING!!! 

The odds of overcoming a 2-1 deficit are 25 eleventy-billion to one.  You also know the commie Post is in on it because they ALREADY show that somehow fake Biden is eventually going to win.

(Seriously y'all - I just made an argument totally in line with Sydney & Jenna & Rudy.  They should send a few hundred thou my way.)