Bear Pit: now the sole domicile of politics at LuLa

[TechTalk]

Ah yes, a report authored that includes representives of the voting system manufactures.  A well trusted source.

Not as exciting to read as the fringe conspiracy websites that you've linked to before like Sharon Rondeau's Post & Email, but it's a start at being better informed.

Stop worrying so much. She posted yesterday...

Mike Lindell Promises “Great News” at Trump March in DC

"DON'T GIVE UP!"

One week ago while at a rally in Georgia for the two U.S. Senate seats currently in play in a January 5 runoff election, Lindell claimed he was privy to information shared by Attys. Lin Wood and Sidney Powell, who have been filing cases in various courts attempting to show “massive fraud” in Georgia and several other “swing” states where Biden was declared the winner after Trump had held significant leads on Election Night.

During his remarks at an Atlanta “March for Trump bus tour” stop, Lindell claimed Trump won the majority of votes in Minnesota, exceeding Biden’s count by an alleged “65,000 votes.” Minnesota, too, was declared a Biden win.

Powell claimed Thursday night that she is in possession of evidence demonstrating that significant numbers of votes were electronically maneuvered away from Trump to Biden as they arrived as well as those involved in the plot to deny Trump a second term.

On Twitter and elsewhere, Lindell, Wood and Powell have all expressed confidence that it can be proved Trump won the election.

If you can't trust the My Pillow guy... who can you trust?

[digitaldog]

I have, you posted the picture.

Exactly the proof of compensation I saw and commented on weeks ago. Thanks for confirming my beliefs.
Now if you could only accept what CISA reported. But by now, I and many of your readers know you can't.

[digitaldog]

Ah yes, a report authored that includes representives of the voting system manufactures.  A well trusted source.

And you have Trump and his clown car of lawyers, right.

[Craig Lamson]

Not as exciting to read as the fringe conspiracy websites that you've linked to before like Sharon Rondeau's Post & Email, but it's a start at being better informed.

Stop worrying so much. She posted yesterday...

One week ago while at a rally in Georgia for the two U.S. Senate seats currently in play in a January 5 runoff election, Lindell claimed he was privy to information shared by Attys. Lin Wood and Sidney Powell, who have been filing cases in various courts attempting to show “massive fraud” in Georgia and several other “swing” states where Biden was declared the winner after Trump had held significant leads on Election Night.

During his remarks at an Atlanta “March for Trump bus tour” stop, Lindell claimed Trump won the majority of votes in Minnesota, exceeding Biden’s count by an alleged “65,000 votes.” Minnesota, too, was declared a Biden win.

Powell claimed Thursday night that she is in possession of evidence demonstrating that significant numbers of votes were electronically maneuvered away from Trump to Biden as they arrived as well as those involved in the plot to deny Trump a second term.

On Twitter and elsewhere, Lindell, Wood and Powell have all expressed confidence that it can be proved Trump won the election.

If you can't trust the My Pillow guy... who can you trust?

Who knows, They may end up being right as time moves on, or they could be wrong.  Just like its possible your "reliable sources" may be full of schiff.  Funny how the fringe sites got the Hunter Biden story right and the "trusted sources" got it all wrong.

Like many things this is destined to be studied for a very long time and results may change.

[Craig Lamson]

And you have Trump and his clown car of lawyers, right.

I've said from the day after the election that Biden would be declared the winner and Trump would lose in court. 

That said, it does not mean this was a "free and fair" election.  YMMV

[digitaldog]

I've said from the day after the election that Biden would be declared the winner and Trump would lose in court. 

A rare and thankful reality check. So there's hope....
He lost in court because he and his really piss-poor lawyers have no/zero/nada evidence of voter fraud, just like you.

That said, it does not mean this was a "free and fair" election.

Back in the bubble, refusing to accept the facts from so, so many, including Fox news.

[Craig Lamson]

Exactly the proof of compensation I saw and commented on weeks ago. Thanks for confirming my beliefs.
Now if you could only accept what CISA reported. But by now, I and many of your readers know you can't.

Proof of compensation?  Now I understand WHY you are so blind to things of consequence.   That you blindly accept the CISA report speaks volumes.

[digitaldog]

That you blindly accept the CISA report speaks volumes.

You are of course entitled to your uninformed opinions on this subject. As I am entitled to my fact based data points.

[Craig Lamson]

A rare and thankful reality check. So there's hope....
He lost in court because he and his really piss-poor lawyers have no evidence kinda like you. Back in the bubble, refusing to accept the facts from so, so many, including Fox news.

He lost in court because no judge was ever going to allow a US presidental election to be contested in this manner, IMO.   You need to expand your horizons and look beyond your nose. 

[Craig Lamson]

You are of course entitled to your uninformed opinions on this subject. As I am entitled to my fact based data points.

My opinions are well informed, and I'll suggest its yours who are based on limited  "facts" and "data points".  You are a sheep.

[digitaldog]

He lost in court because no judge was ever going to allow a US presidental election to be contested in this manner, IMO.   

That and more importantly, an utter lack of evidence of voter fraud.
As for judges and elections, maybe you were too young to recall Bush V Gore.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_v._Gore

And since we're on the topic of those who must believe the untrue:
NIH director asks Americans to leave 'conspiracy theories' behind on vaccines and 'look at the facts'
You an “Anti-vaxxer” too? Surprise us.
Look at the facts....

[digitaldog]

My opinions are well informed...

You are a legend in your own mind. If only other's agreed with you.
Are you always this ill informed, or are you making a special effort today? 

You are a sheep.

As I keep reminding your audience (because you can't see this): The absurd is the last refuge of a pundit without an argument.

[TechTalk]

He lost in court because no judge was ever going to allow a US presidental [presidential–although they both appear to have nice teeth] election to be contested in this manner, IMO.

Yeah, courts tend to want verifiable facts and evidence presented in a coherent legal argument. So you're right about that.

[Craig Lamson]

That and more importantly, an utter lack of evidence of voter fraud.
As for judges and elections, maybe you were too young to recall Bush V Gore.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_v._Gore

And since we're on the topic of those who must believe the untrue:
NIH director asks Americans to leave 'conspiracy theories' behind on vaccines and 'look at the facts'
You an “Anti-vaxxer” too? Surprise us.
Look at the facts....

Bush V Gore was a different story.  Bad choice on your part.

Again LOTS of evidence of possible vote fraud, no real chance to prove it due to the lack of access to the data by the Trump team.  Did you vaunted CISA really investigate on a precinct level, or is it just another panel going through the motions?  Shoe on the other foot time...

I see you need to move the goalposts. Why am I not surprised.

[TechTalk]

Being thrown out of court does not mean the evidence does not exist not the proof is not there.

With that kind of logical statement, you too could be a Trump lawyer writing legal briefs.

[Craig Lamson]

Yeah, courts tend to want verifiable facts and evidence presented in a coherent legal argument. So you're right about that.

Hard to verify what you can't access. But yea Trump has a crappy legal team. 

[Craig Lamson]

With that kind of logical statement, you too could be a Trump lawyer writing legal briefs.

Its completely logical, even if its beyond your ken

[LesPalenik]

BTW, dufus, I don't own a boat.  I have however photographed lots of them for my clients., like that one I'm standing beside in my studio.  You might find it helpful to not make assumptions about things you know nothing about.

Right now, my only boat is a Kevlar expedition canoe, but I photographed also bigger boats for some of my clients. Here is one, but instead of standing beside it, I actually sailed in it.

[digitaldog]

Bush V Gore was a different story.  Bad choice on your part.

An election, judges. Nothing bad in that respect other than again, you can't accept those facts.

Again LOTS of evidence of possible vote fraud, no real chance to prove it due to the lack of access to the data by the Trump team.

 
Possible right. If there's evidence, why can't Trump, his lawyers or you provide any? Possible, right. Can't you even invent some? Guess not.

Did you vaunted CISA really investigate on a precinct level, or is it just another panel going through the motions?  Shoe on the other foot time...

You mean Trumps CISA? Did you forget that both there were observers of both parties at the precinct, or all the votes by mail like Trump used? 
When you find or invent proof of voter fraud, or any evidence that formed inside your bubble, provide it, other wise, back to work:

[LesPalenik]

Hard to verify what you can't access. But yea Trump has a crappy legal team.

Indeed, a crappy legal team. Just like their master.