I really do not understand people like you who are psychologically opposed to solar and wind power. Why? Is it because they are "liberal" causes? Wouldn't any thinking human be delighted to have these become major energy sources, with no fuel costs and no greenhouse emissions?
I am sure that at the turn of the last century, blacksmiths could find stats proving that automobiles could never be successful replacements for horses. There are still people who think that cars from the 1960s were better than the cars of today. People choose to believe a lot of things for lots of different reasons.
There will be applications for which the burning of fossil fuels will continue to make sense and there will be others for which it will make no sense. And the mix will change over time. Using current data on prices for both oil and green equipment also makes no sense, as they are all part of feedback loops so that the prices of things today will not be the same 5 years from now. It wasn't that long ago that many people pompously predicted that "full-frame" sensors will never be the mainstream because of "physics". Well something changed, and it wasn't physics.
Nothing stays still. It is possible today to buy homes that use MUCH less energy than before because of a combination of better materials, better HVAC, better insulation, and off-grid local electricity generation. Hybrid cars are now comparable in price to mainstream cars and no less reliable, plug-in hybrids are almost there. These things could never work, some said, and yet there they are. And the more of them they make, the less they will cost. We have seen this pattern time and time and time again, it's not a particularly new phenomenon. Lots of people thought that dress shirts, ties and suits were the required uniform to do a professional job. How true was that?