You are being deliberately obtuse and argumentative. The articles we are referring to in this exchange were not about "experts" telling you anything nor recommending policy. They were not telling you to do or not do anything nor were they recommending anything to your political authorities. You chose to look at some research, probably in its early stages, that did NOT MAKE ANY RECOMMENDATIONS to you or anyone. Researchers do what they are always do, report findings that others can replicate or not. Characterizing this as another example of "experts" disagreeing is asinine. It means you don't understand what is going on. This has been told to you before numerous times. You are deliberately looking for ways to score irrelevant points.
Your original post was a troll and you complaining about me not making up my mind was another troll. This situation has arisen several times on these pages. You find some obscure piece of uncorroborated reported findings and then complain that the researchers don't know what they're doing. If you are not able to properly comprehend the content of these articles, you have no place making comments on their validity. My advice is to stop reading them and do what your medical authorities tell you to do, which has been quite consistent since the beginning, despite your repeated whining to the contrary.
If you don't believe experts, why are you on this thread.
The problem with the experts is, their message is being manipulated by the media or just not even reported on.
From a recent study in Japan, it is 18.7 times more difficult to catch this outside. I was in a fairly dense neighborhood this morning, shooting for soundstage backdrops, outside. Specifically I was in Passyunk Sq., which is similar to Brooklyn. Nearly everyone was wearing a mask, except me. I got plenty of side eyes, but I'm not wearing a mask outside, full stop. I don't care if it makes people feel better, I care about what is scientifically right, and wearing outside is not. It is way too hard to either catch it or spread it outside, but the media has everyone in a hair-spin over this that no one is getting the real scientific data.
A poll came out that asked people what percentage of those whom died were under 45 and about 50% said half of those who died are under 45. Close to 60% of Dems think this, when the actual number os 2.7%. 53% of C-19 deaths were from nursing home patients. The party of "science" is really showing their colors I guess.
If you're under 10, the data shows you are more likely to be struck by lightning then die of C-19, yet Dems are insisting schools remain closed and that if we open them we are sacrificing our children. No under 24 has died in PA from C-19 as of last week when I looked.
Sorry, but the data is showing this whole thing was a waste. We should be protecting our elderly and letting everyone get back to living.
