If you do a search on this site you can read my comments. In short, even with removing the light gray the tonal results from my file were excellent on matte and Platine satin fiber. very neutral also with surprisingly good resolution and high value separation and dmax.
The one disturbing aspect though is that on the Platine and I assume all the fiber gloss media, the gloss enhancer coat is terrible. This is true with both color and black and white prints.
As Mark McCormick pointed out after doing a lot of subtle profiling, trying to find an acceptable media setting, it looks like they have set this media configuration for rc media. You don’t have the ability to create custom ink limits with density sliders like we do with the Z3200 and Z3100 machines for various media. It appears that HP just stopped halfway through the development of the media ink controls. If you only use matte and rc media it performs very well, but for someone like me who prints 3/4 of my work on fiber gloss media, its not even close to being acceptable. Now if you go through the extra step of applying a post coating with a solvent uv spray, the prints are perfectly fine. But that is not going to cut it for me to have to do that on every job, especially large prints that are expensive and a real pain to produce that way.
I do hope HP gets it together to provide adequate firmware/driver updates to fix this situation. If they haven’t done that by now I certainly can’t figure out what they are thinking, especially since there are so many other nice things about this tech. Canon had a very similar issue with the gloss enhancer function with fiber gloss on their new LF printers and apparently fixed the problem with an updated media setting option.
You should also search on this site for Mark MCs detailed posts about his tests with profiling this printer in regard to color gamut and ink limiting.
quote author=chromebright link=topic=132493.msg1187813#msg1187813 date=1601471761]
My Epson 3800 died recently and I was able to sell the printer and inks on Craigslist just so I could clear some space for the new printer.
Very favorably impressed with the Z9+ and there is a rebate going on this month (Sept. 2020) so I may make the purchase later today.
Just curious about the test prints that Mark Lindquist made for John on the 24" Z9+ using standard profiling. I never saw a follow-up post with the results. John, would you have the time to post about your impression of the B&W prints on Mark's Z9+?
Thanks
Ken Susman
Mendocino, CA
[/quote]