It's cute how people are suddenly concerned with unreasonable spending again now that it's time to potentially elect a Democrat. Oddly enough, I heard a lot of these concerns in 2008-2016 too. Since then it's been relatively quiet. Quite odd, isn't it?
I do agree with this; I find it unsettling that the Republican spend money just like the Dems do, albeit in different areas.
But lets look at this with some perspective. The Republicans love spending money on defense and if you look at all four military sectors plus outside spending, this is about $7T over tens years, which is the time period of the above figures.
Warrens total so far is $135T over ten years, in additional spending, or about 19 times higher. If you took out the Green New Deal, her proposal would still cost 6 times more then what the Republicans like to spend on defense.
Any way you look at it, her proposals would require an obscene amount of capital.
Right now the race is between Trump and some fantasy Dem that the general electorate has no concept of since no candidate has yet emerged as the clear front runner. So all of the current polling rest on this fantasy candidate running against Trump. At some point in time though, a clear front runner will emerge and the reality of who is running will hit the general electorate. If that candidate is Warren, when that reality hits, all of these extremely expensive policy proposals will be front and center in people's minds. I just cant see it being a winning message.