I have to admit this is a very tough choice for me.
Currently, I like the Fuji more, reasons are:
- aspect and resolution, I naturally crop 4:3 images, APS-C is much closer to what I actually use, especially for landscape shots.
This, combined with a larger resolution is a benefit. I noticed that with 16MP I reach the cropping limitations faster (had a Sony Next before with 16MP).
- very nice manual controls, I love those knobs, never had a digital camera with such manual controls and aperture ring
- lighter (minor reason), it feels more compact, on paper it's 110g less with the above combination
Benefits of the Oly are IBIS, fixed aperture 2.8 and wider lens
What I'm wondering is:
The Oly has IBIS which is said to give 4 stops. The Fuji has OIS on the lens, there is a review here:
https://www.imaging-resource.com/lenses/fujinon/xf-18-55mm-f2.8-4-r-lm-ois/image-stabilization-test/APS-C also allows increasing ISO later than MFT.
I wonder how this difference manifest in practical use? Does anyone have experience with both combinations/features and can maybe share an impression?