Thank you.
I run again the benchmark for Photoshop and it's less impressive but still quite significantly better than before.
I do have some questions regarding its validity because on the new computer the graphic card score is much higher despite being the same card.
First, thanks for posting these. I was thinking about getting a 3900x, but my current scores are about the same so that won't be a justification.
I found the final scores are very sensitive to the individual ones. A small, insignificant IMO, individual score results in a larger overall score. I do not think you will notice tens to 50's difference in the overall score, but will in the hundreds.
What really makes a significant difference is processor speed and instructions per clock cycle, less so number of cores. So when you jump generations of processor you will see significant differences.
As for GPU scores, you are running a different architecture (AMD) which will have a different PCI implementation, different graphics drivers, different photoshop graphics interface implementation to some level, all of which can make a difference in the GPU score.
I look to the individual test for differences. You know what they are doing and the result (seconds to run), instead of dome concocted overall score. I think these numbers are valid.
I should add too that there are a number of patches in the OS for Intel vulnerabilities that affect performance. These are not present for the AMD processor and may account for the GPU score difference.