From what you've seen so far, how does this printer compare to the Z3200 in terms of ease of use and maintenance for occasional, low-volume users?
Most photographers would fall into this category - not printing every day, sometimes going weeks, or even months, between prints, if going away for long shooting trips. Epson printers are notoriously bad for this - they are designed for constant, heavy use, such as in print shops, and, for low-volume or infrequent users, the prints ruined due to clogs, paper spent un-clogging heads, and, eventually, replacement of badly-clogged heads made some models not worth owning. Even with the newer, less clog-prone models, ink wasted in cleaning cycles can rapidly add up - gram for gram, ink costs more than gold. This, as much as the inkset itself, was the strength of the Z3100/Z3200 - I hope the new model has continued this.