Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: Durham cathedral  (Read 2262 times)

Paulo Bizarro

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5299
    • http://www.paulobizarro.com
Durham cathedral
« on: November 12, 2018, 11:08:02 am »

Thanks for this article, enjoyed it very much.

Ian99

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 145
Re: Durham cathedral
« Reply #1 on: November 12, 2018, 12:22:43 pm »

Please correct the spelling.
This is an unusually well written article accompanied by nicely taken pictures which, in my mind, is ruined by the use of the words “Naïve” and “Quire” instead of Nave and Choir.
I know how to spell English and have photographed many churches. My religious contacts, most of whom are uptight PITAs all balked at those spellings.
Logged

john beardsworth

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4560
    • My photography site
Re: Durham cathedral
« Reply #2 on: November 12, 2018, 01:26:55 pm »

Please correct the spelling.
This is an unusually well written article accompanied by nicely taken pictures which, in my mind, is ruined by the use of the words “Naïve” and “Quire” instead of Nave and Choir.
I know how to spell English and have photographed many churches. My religious contacts, most of whom are uptight PITAs all balked at those spellings.

Agree. Nave comes from the Latin for boat/ship and has nothing to to with “Naïve”. "Quire" is obscure but acceptable, given that the cathedral uses it, though it isn't great for comprehension. I don't think I've ever heard it used elsewhere.

Durham's ban on non-commercial photography is quite recent - a couple of years ago. In most English cathedrals you can use a tripod for a small fee.

jeremyrh

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 1047
Re: Durham cathedral
« Reply #3 on: November 12, 2018, 04:08:05 pm »

Please correct the spelling.
This is an unusually well written article accompanied by nicely taken pictures which, in my mind, is ruined by the use of the words “Naïve” and “Quire” instead of Nave and Choir.
I know how to spell English and have photographed many churches. My religious contacts, most of whom are uptight PITAs all balked at those spellings.

I baulked at your spelling of balk(*) :-)








(*)  yes, I know balk is also correct - I was making a joke!
Logged

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16660
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Durham cathedral
« Reply #4 on: November 12, 2018, 06:34:01 pm »

I baulked at your spelling of balk(*) :-)








(*)  yes, I know balk is also correct - I was making a joke!
The I guess your balk is worse than your bight.   8)
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

Ray Harrison

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 52
Re: Durham cathedral
« Reply #5 on: November 12, 2018, 07:13:54 pm »

This sparked a memory from the several times I've been to Durham Cathedral and the whole Choir vs Quire thing. This is a remarkable space that has to be seen to be believed, but that aside, I first saw the word Quire mentioned there on a tour - I remember running out to look it up. Here's an interesting link for those who are interested.

https://www.durhamworldheritagesite.com/architecture/cathedral/intro/quire

Cheers,
Ray


Logged

luxborealis

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2741
    • luxBorealis.com - photography by Terry McDonald
Re: Durham cathedral
« Reply #6 on: November 12, 2018, 07:21:41 pm »

This sparked a memory from the several times I've been to Durham Cathedral and the whole Choir vs Quire thing. This is a remarkable space that has to be seen to be believed, but that aside, I first saw the word Quire mentioned there on a tour - I remember running out to look it up. Here's an interesting link for those who are interested.
https://www.durhamworldheritagesite.com/architecture/cathedral/intro/quire
Cheers,
Ray

Right on, Ray. QUIRE is the correct spelling. And Durham is a spectacular cathedral.
Logged
Terry McDonald - luxBorealis.com

Jeremy Roussak

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7595
Re: Durham cathedral
« Reply #7 on: November 13, 2018, 02:58:02 am »

The I guess your balk is worse than your bight.   8)

"A man who would make so vile a pun would not scruple to pick a pocket"

Samuel Johnson (or someone else)

Jeremy
Logged

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 16660
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: Durham cathedral
« Reply #8 on: November 13, 2018, 08:08:54 am »

"A man who would make so vile a pun would not scruple to pick a pocket"

Samuel Johnson (or someone else)

Jeremy
So that's why you've been keeping your distance from me lately.   ;)
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

Ian99

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 145
Re: Durham cathedral
« Reply #9 on: November 13, 2018, 09:47:10 am »

In real English, a naïve Durham quire boy is an unsophisticated lad from that town who counts sheets of paper. The use of Naïve for Nave is flat-out wrong, and Durham’s use of the archaic word “quire”, reeks of affectation and as John B says “it isn’t great for comprehension”. Although it has to be said that institutions like Durham cathedral are not known for leading comprehension.

Next you will be telling me that the article was shot with a Leica lense.
Logged

faberryman

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 679
Re: Durham cathedral
« Reply #10 on: November 13, 2018, 10:34:26 am »

Next you will be telling me that the article was shot with a Leica lense.
If I remember correctly (the OP seems to have deleted his original post with the link to the article), it was shot with a 50mm Leica lense, which is an odd choice of focal length for cathedral photographs. Perhaps it was the only one he had.

Jeremy Roussak

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7595
Re: Durham cathedral
« Reply #11 on: November 13, 2018, 12:42:58 pm »

If I remember correctly (the OP seems to have deleted his original post with the link to the article), it was shot with a 50mm Leica lense, which is an odd choice of focal length for cathedral photographs. Perhaps it was the only one he had.

He's not deleted anything: the original article was published here.

Jeremy
Logged

Ian99

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 145
Re: Durham cathedral
« Reply #12 on: November 14, 2018, 11:35:48 am »

Bange heade againste walle.
Logged

jeremyrh

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 1047
Re: Durham cathedral
« Reply #13 on: November 14, 2018, 12:46:34 pm »

The most archaic part of the article is reference to British Rail :-)

Otherwise, always interesting to read someone else's view of somewhere you know well.
Logged

Paulo Bizarro

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5299
    • http://www.paulobizarro.com
Re: Durham cathedral
« Reply #14 on: November 15, 2018, 06:23:21 am »

As the starter of this thread, I am surprised that folks miss the forest (article plus photos) for the tree (spelling corrections).

john beardsworth

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4560
    • My photography site
Re: Durham cathedral
« Reply #15 on: November 15, 2018, 07:02:42 am »

As the starter of this thread, I am surprised that folks miss the forest (article plus photos) for the tree (spelling corrections).

Why? Isn't one's appreciation of a fine landscape photo spoiled when the photographer hasn't corrected a lot of obvious sensor dust spots?

Alan Goldhammer

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3335
    • A Goldhammer Photography
Re: Durham cathedral
« Reply #16 on: November 15, 2018, 08:27:28 am »

I enjoyed reading the article as well.  However there is this statement, "To simplify, my camera generally takes better B&W photos than a color camera does..." referring to the Leica monochrome camera.  I think this has been shown not to be the case and one can get wonderful monochrome images from 'standard' digital cameras with proper processing.
Logged

Paulo Bizarro

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5299
    • http://www.paulobizarro.com
Re: Durham cathedral
« Reply #17 on: November 16, 2018, 04:55:18 am »

Why? Isn't one's appreciation of a fine landscape photo spoiled when the photographer hasn't corrected a lot of obvious sensor dust spots?

What a strange comparison...

john beardsworth

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4560
    • My photography site
Re: Durham cathedral
« Reply #18 on: November 16, 2018, 05:52:13 am »

What a strange comparison...

I would have thought it was perfectly obvious. As a native English speaker (maybe that is our difference?) that was my feeling as I read the entire article and kept stopping at the words "Naïve" and "Quire". Huh, is that deliberate, does it mean something I should understand, was it indeed American English, or is it the curse of dictation software? Once or twice, no big deal, but this print was covered with uncorrected naïves and dozens of quires which may have belonged in the scene but still looked like dust spots too. Puzzlement doesn't usually aid comprehension or enhance appreciation.

Ian99

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 145
Re: Durham cathedral
« Reply #19 on: November 16, 2018, 09:41:51 am »

I fully concur with John B.
In this Article the pics are good but the text is very good and that is unusual for articles published here. I enjoyed the text apart from the two words mentioned above.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up