Alan, I'm wondering whether there isn't just an error in specification somewhere. I don't see how they would deliberately offer the same package for 9.95 in one part of their website and 19.95 in another. Either the 19 is a typo, or there are offering something more for the extra 10 bucks, or the 9 is a lingering error after deciding to raise the price to 19. But in this latter case, they would have advised customers of the price increase, unless they intend to maintain two classes of customer: the ones who are already subscribed versus the ones who will subscribe henceforth. I doubt this would be viewed as a fair and sustainable business strategy, insofar as it violates the one-price principle. They should clean it up - an Adobe spokesperson should get onto this Forum and tell us what the pricing is.