Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down

Author Topic: Just curious  (Read 3545 times)

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Just curious
« Reply #20 on: September 15, 2018, 04:17:18 am »

Ha, wedding photography is probably on of the disciplines where clogged black and blown out whites are a sign of incompetence.

Well of course! The poor woman spends her childhood imagining the perfect dress, her mother and father a fortune buying the damned thing, and then you (not you) expect her to be happy when she can't have preserved, in photographs (that continue the mental infectionvoyage of discovery to her granddaughters), the perfection, the detail, the embroidery and nuances of sheen and tones of white and whiter than white virginity so blatantly expressed On The Day, possibly to the great mirth of her numerous best friends?

Sloppy exposure metering, a badly understood histogram, and there you go: twenty-somethig years of indoctrination shattered in a series of false clicks!

Who'd be a bride or a wedding photographer?

;-)

Chris Calohan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3512
  • Editing Allowed
Re: Just curious
« Reply #21 on: September 15, 2018, 09:21:38 am »

My knee jerk reaction is to not have 'em, because I was raised on a steady diet of Adams. But when I put my mind to it, I don't mind 'em if they don't distract, or are part of the point. I am incredibly slapdash with exposure these days, because digital lets me commit almost infinite wickedness without anyone knowing.

If it's any comfort, the other chap's pictures are ridiculous, twee, mawkish junk, AND he's got no control over his tone curve. He's blowing highlights left and right because he doesn't know any better. The bride's dress would look much better if he knew how to place tones.

So you still frequent that forum, eh? Winning wasn't the point, the point was letting others know everything you said above. He doesn't know where to place his tones or how to make the B&G the stars...he just makes excuses to people who think he knows what the heck he's talking about....I guess more power to him, but geeze, really?
Logged
If it Ain't Broke, Leave it Alone; if it is Broke, Fix it; if it's a Maybe, Play With it - Who Knows

amolitor

  • Contributor
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 607
Re: Just curious
« Reply #22 on: September 15, 2018, 09:48:06 am »

I poke my nose in for a skim now and then to keep tabs on what the eternal beginners are up to. As you may be aware I have an interest in the various cultures of the world of photography.

The other chap is on my mental list of "terrible but in an interesting way" folks, so I opened the thread on my recent pass.
Logged

Rand47

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1882
Re: Just curious
« Reply #23 on: September 15, 2018, 10:47:25 am »

Ha, wedding photography is probably on of the disciplines where clogged black and blown out whites are a sign of incompetence.

I wish... I’m old, so I don’t count, but the trend in wedding photography where you won’t find a single straight horizon, and colors that look like a bad C print that has been in a shoebox for 30 years and turned cyan/green, blocked shadows, blown highlights... (no objection to doing so if it “actually works” which most of the time in these type photos it doesn’t)... Well, to my eye it just looks ugly. 

It kind of reminds me of lovely young women getting ink over most of their body.  Might look great when you’re 25, but probably not so much at 65.  The album might look “trendy” today, but even a few years from now it will just look like a really bad job.

Rand
« Last Edit: September 15, 2018, 01:52:16 pm by Rand47 »
Logged
Rand Scott Adams

amolitor

  • Contributor
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 607
Re: Just curious
« Reply #24 on: September 15, 2018, 12:41:11 pm »

I think the guy actually can't see his blown highlights.

The other forum members seemed to coalesce around the idea that Chris was complaining about the blown out sun, and then amused themselves with mockery. The original photographer did not correct them, either because he was enjoying the support of his friend too much, or because he actually cannot see that the dress was blown out here and there in several of the shots.

What makes this interesting to me that if he were not (presenting himself as) a successful photographer, everyone else in the forum would have shredded him for his technical flaws, but since he is (allegedly) "a pro" the forum falls over themselves whenever he posts anything. That's a depressingly common cultural element in these things. And correspondingly, because he has adopted this persona, and received support for it, he's become remarkably arrogant, flying into a minor tempest of angry disdain when criticized -- being sure that he's going to be backed up by his posse.

It's a lot like high school. The popular kids are, well, they're just popular and you can't quite define why. But there it is, and it's pretty unpleasant for everyone outside the clique, so be sure to join the sycophant brigade early!

The original photographer does have some solid soft skills. He is able to nail those moments when the bride dewily clings to her man, eyes demurely downcast, or alternatively gazing up adoringly, and he's using some presets that warm colors and lift the midtones to produce that golden airy look (and, as a side effect, rather yellow wedding dresses). But brides love the dewy girls and the glowing midtones, and so it sells.
Logged

Jeremy Roussak

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8961
    • site
Re: Just curious
« Reply #25 on: September 15, 2018, 01:32:05 pm »

So you still frequent that forum, eh?

OK, you're going to have to let us (or at any rate me) in on the secret. Which forum?

Jeremy
Logged

Chris Calohan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3512
  • Editing Allowed
Re: Just curious
« Reply #26 on: September 15, 2018, 11:26:11 pm »

OK, you're going to have to let us (or at any rate me) in on the secret. Which forum?

Jeremy

Photo forum
Logged
If it Ain't Broke, Leave it Alone; if it is Broke, Fix it; if it's a Maybe, Play With it - Who Knows

Chris Calohan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3512
  • Editing Allowed
Re: Just curious
« Reply #27 on: September 15, 2018, 11:29:13 pm »

I wish... I’m old, so I don’t count, but the trend in wedding photography where you won’t find a single straight horizon, and colors that look like a bad C print that has been in a shoebox for 30 years and turned cyan/green, blocked shadows, blown highlights... (no objection to doing so if it “actually works” which most of the time in these type photos it doesn’t)... Well, to my eye it just looks ugly. 

It kind of reminds me of lovely young women getting ink over most of their body.  Might look great when you’re 25, but probably not so much at 65.  The album might look “trendy” today, but even a few years from now it will just look like a really bad job.

Rand

So true, unfortunately, so true.
Logged
If it Ain't Broke, Leave it Alone; if it is Broke, Fix it; if it's a Maybe, Play With it - Who Knows

Robert Roaldi

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4768
    • Robert's Photos
Re: Just curious
« Reply #28 on: September 16, 2018, 08:42:06 am »

Could be that someone who wants to appear hip just does not want "traditional" wedding photos. I've often wondered if anyone ever looks at their photo albums or they are just something everyone buys, like the wedding day flowers that all end up in the garbage soon enough. I don't know anyone who did not live together for significant lengths of time before marrying, the "special day" kind of loses some of its cachet under those circumstances. Maybe to them, the wedding day is just another party. Factor in the 50% (or so) divorce rate, and the brutal fact remains that marriages and weddings don't mean what they used to.

Anyway, isn't the customer always right?
Logged
--
Robert

amolitor

  • Contributor
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 607
Re: Just curious
« Reply #29 on: September 16, 2018, 09:40:01 am »

I think there are at least two aspects to weddings, which affect how they get photographed.

On the one hand, we are having a celebration of this thing we are doing, this commitment we make. We have our family, our friends, we're having a party.

On the other hand, this is also a pageant, a false show, to reveal and promote a few things: The money we've spent, the love the couple has for one another, and the beauty of the bride -- all of which might be completely untrue, it doesn't matter because damn it the show must go on.

Most big dollar wedding photography focuses on the pageant. The mission is to make it look expensive, beautiful, and filled with a sort of glow of love. I look at those pictures and I think "everyone is miserable, except the people who are drunk" because they all know in their hearts that it's a show. The cracks are clearly visible, not because they people aren't smiling (there's photoshop for that) but because nobody looks like that in real life. The dewy bride clings, the grooms look manly, the bridesmaids uniformly have the same vapid smile glued to their faces. Oh look, and now they all leap into the air at once how spontaneous, because people do THAT all the time.

Logged

elliot_n

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1219
Re: Just curious
« Reply #30 on: September 16, 2018, 10:22:47 am »

Logged

Chris Calohan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3512
  • Editing Allowed
Re: Just curious
« Reply #31 on: September 16, 2018, 11:25:14 am »

The blackest blacks:

https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2016/sep/26/anish-kapoor-vantablack-art-architecture-exclusive-rights-to-the-blackest-black

(He uses them well.)

I don't have a problem with blacks, per se, I have a problem when blacks are clogged where they shouldn't be. This guy didn't particularly clog any blacks but he was all over the place in where he set his tonal values, thus his highlights all had more of a "blown" look to them and not as a contributing highlight.
Logged
If it Ain't Broke, Leave it Alone; if it is Broke, Fix it; if it's a Maybe, Play With it - Who Knows

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18090
  • When everyone thinks the same, nobody thinks
    • My website
Re: Just curious
« Reply #32 on: September 16, 2018, 12:32:15 pm »

...This guy...

Any chance we get a link to the picture(s) and see ourselves?

elliot_n

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1219
Re: Just curious
« Reply #33 on: September 16, 2018, 12:56:30 pm »

Any chance we get a link to the picture(s) and see ourselves?

Is it this thread?

https://www.thephotoforum.com/threads/been-a-while-but-a-few-digital-previews-from-a-recent-wedding.430425/

If so, the OP/bulldurham is being unreasonable.
« Last Edit: September 16, 2018, 01:00:34 pm by elliot_n »
Logged

amolitor

  • Contributor
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 607
Re: Just curious
« Reply #34 on: September 16, 2018, 01:24:56 pm »

If so, the OP/bulldurham is being unreasonable.

Possibly. But he began fairly reasonable, and then everyone crapped on him because they like the photographer, and then the wheels fell off. Typical forum nonsense. That forum, in particular, is awful about dissenting opinions.
Logged

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18090
  • When everyone thinks the same, nobody thinks
    • My website
Re: Just curious
« Reply #35 on: September 16, 2018, 04:26:37 pm »

Is it this thread?

https://www.thephotoforum.com/threads/been-a-while-but-a-few-digital-previews-from-a-recent-wedding.430425/...

So what exactly people on this thread here, on LuLa, and in particular Chris, find objectionable in those photographs (I do not want to get entangled in the comments on that other forum)?

Chris Calohan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3512
  • Editing Allowed
Re: Just curious
« Reply #36 on: September 16, 2018, 04:42:16 pm »

That is the forum thread: I don't like taking stuff from one forum and posting on another as it constitutes plagiarism. What I found objectionable is the blown highlights on her dress and the lack of tonal control pretty much anywhere.  It seems as if he meters for the overall scene and lets the chips fall where they may...perhaps I am just too old school to think that constitutes good photography.
Logged
If it Ain't Broke, Leave it Alone; if it is Broke, Fix it; if it's a Maybe, Play With it - Who Knows

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Just curious
« Reply #37 on: September 16, 2018, 05:04:15 pm »

I enjoy shooting windows and reflections; they can be exposed any old way I like!

Who'd shoot for any brand new Mr & Mrs Joe Public!

:-)

elliot_n

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1219
Re: Just curious
« Reply #38 on: September 16, 2018, 05:05:40 pm »

Her dress looks fine to me. I don't see a 'lack of tonal control'.
Logged

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18090
  • When everyone thinks the same, nobody thinks
    • My website
Re: Just curious
« Reply #39 on: September 16, 2018, 05:50:28 pm »

That is the forum thread: I don't like taking stuff from one forum and posting on another as it constitutes plagiarism...

Not at all. It would have been simply "fair use," even if you posted those pictures here for discussion. A link only is totally cool.
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up