You have not been following the thread carefully and the context in which I used "nothing that was said...". Earlier in the thread, I posted a screenshot where I clearly included "witch" into opinions, not facts. Then I asked in another post if facts can be considered misogynistic. Therefore, my subsequent post was about facts that can be verified by videos, which clearly excludes "witch."
... Your use of a particular word to describe someone's behaviour is also evidence of your misogyny...
The history of that post and those that follow (thus far), indicate that is largely if not totally 'fake news'.
No comment. I'm sworn to secrecy.
More fake news attached to a comment.
I'll have to check the tape to see what I really said. I don't recall at this time.
And speaking for everyone in the world no less, a sign of absurdity or comedy (without the required ) to indicate it's not to be taken seriously for those who haven't been reading such posts for awhile and know better.
Oh, it's to be taken seriously, Andrew.
I am not necessarily defending you personally, but free speech. Also commenting against the double standard, as I explained in my post above.Would anyone else here that insults the President on a daily basis be so gentlemanly as well and apologize?
...I'm playing the ball and not the man.
Kudos to you. Then again, I did not single you out personally, did I?
Would you be so kind to provide an Index Verborum Prohibitorum so that I know which words not to use?
Doesn't really work like that. For example, calling someone a "big-nosed Serb" may be rude, but it's not necessarily racist; "big-nosed Jew" is another matter.Might seem complicated, but decent people will see the distinction.
