And disregard what I said about your using the "Ambient" port for measuring the bulbs. I don't know enough about what's going on with your measurement process nor do I have a spectro. Can't afford one anyway.
Anyone who's read more than a few of your posts on this subject have already disregarded what you wrote about a piece of hardware you know very little of anything about. Hence your silly rant/question to Wayne after which again, I had to correct you then bring you into our world of facts and science. Indeed, the most accurate text you've written in a very long time here is your admission you don't know enough about the measuring process many of the rest of us do clearly understand. And have actually experienced. Now if you'd consider
how much you know, you don't know before posting, we'd all get more done in these parts. But you don't know what you don't know even when you're told correctly about how the stuff you have no experience with, actually works by experts who do know how they work. None being color scientists if you can actually believe that fact!
It wouldn't help me figure out how to predict what colors will distort with these daylight LED bulbs.
Again, you know so little about this topic and how to measure color, your comment, like so many posted here is best ignored. Which
is my goal in pointing out again, your massive misunderstandings of this topic along with your own admission of a lack of any experience measuring color.
The CRI numbers only tell me a progression of yellow and skin tone colors that appear to improve according to the CRI number but it doesn't answer why CCT 5000K daylight LED bulbs show this greenish yellow tint of white when there's nothing on planet Earth that shows this hue of white in any natural lighting situation including flash and direct sunlight.
When you ask stupid questions expect stupid answers. No, that isn't what CRI tells those who understand what CRI is and how rather useless it is.
And Andrew can kiss my ass with his unhelpful comments.
The comments were never meant to be useful to
you; that's not possible as you're a fact denier. The comments were made to correct your misinformed posts for
others and the comments at least today, seem to have been successful in getting a newer member who hasn't witnessed your inability to post facts on color science a tip he too should ignore your rants. The kissing the ass part shows you've got to lower yourself down further from an amateur who has so little experience with this topic of color, to someone morphing into a troll here which
may deserve moderation due to that comment. I personally don’t care you wrote it, there's no way I could kiss your ass when your own lips seem to be stuck onto that area of anatomy. Perhaps that position is why you are unable to measure an illuminant like some many other's here. Amateurs like you should read more, type less, assuming your newer agenda is to learn this topic. Until that occurs, what is your agenda for regularly posting misinformation that has been regularly dismissed and corrected with facts, by experts and professionals in the field of color and imaging?
Do we need to talk to your mom and dad about taking away your keyboard son? Shorten your curfew?
