Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Down

Author Topic: Upgrade to Eizo?  (Read 21609 times)

smahn

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 284
Re: Upgrade to Eizo?
« Reply #60 on: September 27, 2018, 04:36:25 pm »

I can't help you compare the PA302 to anything based on actual usage and experience. I can help compare the 272W to the 271Q as I've owned both. Sorry.

Yeah, Dog, that's what I meant, the 272W vs the 271Q.
Logged

digitaldog

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 20630
  • Andrew Rodney
    • http://www.digitaldog.net/
Re: Upgrade to Eizo?
« Reply #61 on: September 27, 2018, 04:40:04 pm »

Yeah, Dog, that's what I meant, the 272W vs the 271Q.
Well I have below (or above depending on your LuLa preference's  ;) ) based only on having the Q unit for about a week.
Logged
http://www.digitaldog.net/
Author "Color Management for Photographers".

smahn

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 284
Re: Upgrade to Eizo?
« Reply #62 on: September 27, 2018, 05:29:26 pm »

Well I have below (or above depending on your LuLa preference's  ;) ) based only on having the Q unit for about a week.

I saw talk about connections, bezels, weight, temp, sensor, etc. Little about image quality. But don't sweat it if you don't want to.
Logged

digitaldog

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 20630
  • Andrew Rodney
    • http://www.digitaldog.net/
Re: Upgrade to Eizo?
« Reply #63 on: September 27, 2018, 05:42:14 pm »

I saw talk about connections, bezels, weight, temp, sensor, etc.
Indeed! That’s all you’ll get from me for the time being. :-\
Logged
http://www.digitaldog.net/
Author "Color Management for Photographers".

smahn

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 284
Re: Upgrade to Eizo?
« Reply #64 on: September 27, 2018, 05:47:50 pm »

Indeed! That’s all you’ll get from me for the time being. :-\

So be it.
Logged

digitaldog

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 20630
  • Andrew Rodney
    • http://www.digitaldog.net/
Re: Upgrade to Eizo?
« Reply #65 on: September 27, 2018, 05:53:17 pm »

Logged
http://www.digitaldog.net/
Author "Color Management for Photographers".

smahn

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 284
Re: Upgrade to Eizo?
« Reply #66 on: September 27, 2018, 06:00:02 pm »

Once again indeed.

Good on you for getting the last word, rather than just being forthcoming.
Logged

digitaldog

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 20630
  • Andrew Rodney
    • http://www.digitaldog.net/
Re: Upgrade to Eizo?
« Reply #67 on: September 27, 2018, 06:06:33 pm »

Good on you for getting the last word, rather than just being forthcoming.
You got ALL and exactly what you deserve. ;)
Logged
http://www.digitaldog.net/
Author "Color Management for Photographers".

smahn

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 284
Re: Upgrade to Eizo?
« Reply #68 on: September 27, 2018, 06:13:00 pm »

Nobody on this site can be spun like a top more than you. So tempting...
Logged

digitaldog

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 20630
  • Andrew Rodney
    • http://www.digitaldog.net/
Re: Upgrade to Eizo?
« Reply #69 on: September 27, 2018, 06:21:45 pm »

Nobody on this site can be spun like a top more than you. So tempting...
What obligation do you feel I am under that requires I assist you in ANY information about anything considering your attitude?

To partially answer your question, the quality of my images are still very good to me on the new display. :)
« Last Edit: September 27, 2018, 06:46:32 pm by digitaldog »
Logged
http://www.digitaldog.net/
Author "Color Management for Photographers".

smahn

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 284
Re: Upgrade to Eizo?
« Reply #70 on: September 27, 2018, 06:51:45 pm »

What obligation do you feel I am under that requires I assist you in ANY information about anything considering your attitude?

To partially answer your question, the quality of my image is still in very good to me on the new display. :)

Dude, what's with my attitude? I asked you to compare the IQ to a monitor you don't have. You responded that you could only do so on the 2 monitors you do have -- so I asked for that. You hemmed, hawed and misdirected. When it became clear the info you indicated you could offer would not be offered, I gave up with "so be it". You come back with "indeed" and complaining of my attitude.

I still give up. But I can't help but find humor in your approach up and down LL. Go ahead, take the last word, you always do. Just get it over with already. Later dude.
Logged

digitaldog

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 20630
  • Andrew Rodney
    • http://www.digitaldog.net/
Re: Upgrade to Eizo?
« Reply #71 on: September 27, 2018, 07:44:43 pm »

Dude, what's with my attitude?
Here are a few examples:
Quote
I saw talk about connections, bezels, weight, temp, sensor, etc. Little about image quality. But don't sweat it if you don't want to.
Good on you for getting the last word, rather than just being forthcoming.
Nobody on this site can be spun like a top more than you. So tempting...
Again, I'm not under any obligation to provide you a review, not with about a week's usage under my belt. Ask Kevin or Chris to assign a reviewer perhaps. Assuming you're a paying subscriber of this site.
Quote
You hemmed, hawed and misdirected.

I told you what I know thus far.
Quote
When it became clear the info you indicated you could offer would not be offered, I gave up with "so be it". You come back with "indeed" and complaining of my attitude.
Indeed.
Quote
I still give up.

I'm OK with that.  ;)
« Last Edit: September 27, 2018, 07:49:33 pm by digitaldog »
Logged
http://www.digitaldog.net/
Author "Color Management for Photographers".

smahn

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 284
Re: Upgrade to Eizo?
« Reply #72 on: September 28, 2018, 03:07:10 pm »

Andrew, that's not an attitude problem, that's confusion. I asked you to compare the IQ of the 272W vs the 271Q based on your saying this:

Quote
I can't help you compare the PA302 to anything based on actual usage and experience. I can help compare the 272W to the 271Q as I've owned both. Sorry.

IOW, I took you up on your offer. But instead of saying you're not ready to compare IQ yet, which I'd have understood completely, you implied you'd already answered the question above or below.

Just asking you be clear and not play games.

Logged

Czornyj

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1948
    • zarzadzaniebarwa.pl
Re: Upgrade to Eizo?
« Reply #73 on: October 01, 2018, 12:20:41 pm »

Fair enough. But while I have you, how would you say it compares to your 272W in those regards. Any overtly noticeable improvements wrt image quality?

Image quality is noticeably better - OCF reduces the "IPS glow" very well, contrast is higher, uniformity is better (with DUC set to off it's still better than in PA272W with activated DUC), gamut slightly larger thanks to W-LED with PFS phosphor backlight.
Logged
Marcin Kałuża | [URL=http://zarzadzaniebarwa

faberryman

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Upgrade to Eizo?
« Reply #74 on: October 01, 2018, 12:46:28 pm »

Image quality is noticeably better - OCF reduces the "IPS glow" very well, contrast is higher, uniformity is better (with DUC set to off it's still better than in PA272W with activated DUC), gamut slightly larger thanks to W-LED with PFS phosphor backlight.
Calibrated monitors are a money pit and a rabbit hole. My Epson 3880 prints match my Apple Thunderbolt display very well. I just had to adjust the brightness level on my monitor to match my prints to reduce paper waste. Nobody thinks of calibrating the monitor to the camera sensor to begin with, and we all know how the color palette varies among camera brands, so color accuracy is out the window from the start. 
« Last Edit: October 01, 2018, 12:58:37 pm by faberryman »
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Up