Pages: 1 ... 121 122 [123] 124 125 ... 184   Go Down

Author Topic: Without Prejudice 3  (Read 336276 times)

fdisilvestro

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1735
    • Frank Disilvestro
Re: Without Prejudice 3
« Reply #2440 on: December 29, 2018, 06:06:32 am »

The dilemma ... (maybe few would understand)  ;)

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Without Prejudice 3
« Reply #2441 on: December 29, 2018, 10:09:40 am »

No problem whatsoever - for me: I got rid of my F4S because it never auto-loaded properly on the first try; I had traded away my F and F2 Photomic by this time, and to get rid of the F4S I went backwards to the F3 which was better, except that unlike my other, older Nikons, without a battery it was stuck with one useless mechanical speed. I think the F2 was the final Nikon film masterpiece.

That F3 camera was almost never used, and I still have it today, where it lives in the dark beside my Minolta Flashmeter 111. Regarding the consumables: for 135 colour it had to be Kodachrome 64 Pro or nothing.

Those were the days!

Happy New Year, Francisco.

faberryman

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4834
Re: Without Prejudice 3
« Reply #2442 on: December 29, 2018, 10:28:04 am »

Regarding the consumables: for 135 colour it had to be Kodachrome 64 Pro or nothing.
It was Kodachrome 25 for me. I'm not sure how I got along all those years with an ASA 25 film though. Today it seems unthinkable.
Logged

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Without Prejudice 3
« Reply #2443 on: December 29, 2018, 01:53:46 pm »

It was Kodachrome 25 for me. I'm not sure how I got along all those years with an ASA 25 film though. Today it seems unthinkable.


In some respects the 25 ASA stuff was better; for me, the problem was the contrast was generally going to be too harsh, especially on beaches with only a reflector to help out, and I disliked using those if avoidable.

Rob

fdisilvestro

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1735
    • Frank Disilvestro
Re: Without Prejudice 3
« Reply #2444 on: December 29, 2018, 04:43:52 pm »

No problem whatsoever - for me: I got rid of my F4S because it never auto-loaded properly on the first try; I had traded away my F and F2 Photomic by this time, and to get rid of the F4S I went backwards to the F3 which was better, except that unlike my other, older Nikons, without a battery it was stuck with one useless mechanical speed. I think the F2 was the final Nikon film masterpiece.

That F3 camera was almost never used, and I still have it today, where it lives in the dark beside my Minolta Flashmeter 111. Regarding the consumables: for 135 colour it had to be Kodachrome 64 Pro or nothing.

Those were the days!

Happy New Year, Francisco.

Thanks Rob and happy New Year to you too

I agree that the Nikon F2 was the final Nikon film masterpiece and it will probably outlast any other machine on this earth, but the F6 is a joy to use (and I don't care what other people think)

I loved Kodachrome 25 for landscapes and 64 for people / general use, but I'm sure they will not come back. In regards to E100, I like the color palette

Regards

JNB_Rare

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1041
    • JNB54
Re: Without Prejudice 3
« Reply #2445 on: January 07, 2019, 02:35:11 pm »

Every Which Way But Loose. The words popped into my head even before I raised the camera to my eye, and definitely before I remembered that it was the title of a B movie starring Clint Eastwood and an orangutan.
Logged

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5171
    • Photos
Re: Without Prejudice 3
« Reply #2446 on: January 08, 2019, 12:15:30 pm »

,

Jeremy Roussak

  • On Probation
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8961
    • site
Re: Without Prejudice 3
« Reply #2447 on: January 08, 2019, 01:07:39 pm »

Every Which Way But Loose. The words popped into my head even before I raised the camera to my eye, and definitely before I remembered that it was the title of a B movie starring Clint Eastwood and an orangutan.

A B movie? Surely not. It's great fun.

Jeremy
Logged

RSL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 15543
    • http://www.russ-lewis.com
Re: Without Prejudice 3
« Reply #2448 on: January 08, 2019, 01:32:32 pm »

Ya gotta remember, Jeremy, it's Hollywood deciding whether a movie is an A or a B. Hollywood!
Logged
Russ Lewis  www.russ-lewis.com.

JNB_Rare

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1041
    • JNB54
Re: Without Prejudice 3
« Reply #2449 on: January 08, 2019, 02:25:37 pm »

A B movie? Surely not. It's great fun.

Jeremy

But consider that there are C, D, E and "holy F, what was that?" movies.  ;D
Logged

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5171
    • Photos
Re: Without Prejudice 3
« Reply #2450 on: January 08, 2019, 05:08:47 pm »

Headshots

Rob C

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24074
Re: Without Prejudice 3
« Reply #2451 on: January 08, 2019, 05:23:28 pm »

But consider that there are C, D, E and "holy F, what was that?" movies.  ;D


I'd vote for the effs!

:-)

Rayyan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 464
Re: Without Prejudice 3
« Reply #2452 on: January 09, 2019, 10:37:31 am »

Bhutan
Logged

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5171
    • Photos
Re: Without Prejudice 3
« Reply #2453 on: January 09, 2019, 01:42:05 pm »

hey

Telecaster

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3686
Re: Without Prejudice 3
« Reply #2454 on: January 09, 2019, 05:14:54 pm »

Logged

Telecaster

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3686
Re: Without Prejudice 3
« Reply #2455 on: January 09, 2019, 05:17:05 pm »

Bhutan

Lovely. A sight I wouldn't object to seeing.  :)

-Dave-
Logged

armand

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5171
    • Photos
Re: Without Prejudice 3
« Reply #2456 on: January 09, 2019, 05:24:54 pm »

-Dave-

This is more head and shoulders  :D

Rayyan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 464
Re: Without Prejudice 3
« Reply #2457 on: January 10, 2019, 10:07:41 am »


Thank you Dave. Much appreciated.

Bhutan

Best.

Lovely. A sight I wouldn't object to seeing.  :)

-Dave-
Logged

Rayyan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 464
Re: Without Prejudice 3
« Reply #2458 on: January 10, 2019, 10:10:29 am »


Bhutan
Logged

KLaban

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2428
    • Keith Laban Photography
Re: Without Prejudice 3
« Reply #2459 on: January 10, 2019, 10:29:56 am »

Lovely work, Rayyan, particularly the last image.
« Last Edit: January 10, 2019, 10:35:38 am by KLaban »
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 121 122 [123] 124 125 ... 184   Go Up