Was the analog shot scanned? thus it becomes digital. Unless the shot is being actually developed and printed in a darkroom, which is easier for B&W and color even in 16 x 20 size, I feel that once it's scanned it's digital, it's just digital capture by another method, in this case a scanner. The largest negative I ever worked in a darkroom color or B&W was 4x5, I can't imagine working with 8x10 without a scan.
Just my thoughts on this as the film vs digital argument for color left me a long time ago, just too much hassle for color in the darkroom and if you scan the negative, the rest is digital.
For over 7 years I worked with Cibrachrome in the darkroom and loved the look, however all those prints have now totally faded and I greatly prefer working a scanned negative and making an inkjet or Fuji print from them. There is no comparison to working in total darkness i.e. color in a darkroom, and scanning in the same file and working it in digital at least for me. B&W is totally different subject as the workflow in the darkroom is much more relaxed, at least for me.
Paul Caldwell