I have been a software engineer since the 1970s, and later an Internet pioneer-entrepreneur, creating large enterprise-level sites, etc. In my experience, the most difficult problem with these kinds of projects is scaling. I would guess this is the problem with the X1D; Hasselblad was forced to scale by the demand for the product, but perhaps had not thought out scaling-process as well as was required. They were overwhelmed and this forced the cash infusion.
It is usual, not unusual, for a company with the needed cash to buy into (and even take over) a smaller company that is struggling with a scale or fail situation. Unless the larger company has no integrity, they can bring all kinds of good things to the table, like what is needed to succeed, given the situation. They do usually alter things too.
Since DJI seems to be hip and tech-smart, my guess is we should be happy this has taken place. Otherwise, the whole X1D project might have stalled out. That being said, and since I have my X1D on order, I am going to (perhaps) order the Fuji GFX system when pre-orders are opened, against the case that Hasselblad stumbles in some really serious manner. I am confident that the Fuji GFX will be integral and the delivery process (lenses, etc.) will be smooth. Yet, who knows? I also really want a Nikon D810 successor with 54 Mpx. I have read enough posts by Kevin Raber that I believe he has the right information (and probably more), and I am glad he shared it.