Here is the results of the test shoot today. The X-T1 with the 18-55 and the X-T2 with the 55-200, both set to 55mm. I know it would have been better to use the same lens on each camera, but I'm not a fan of switching lenses in the field. Settings on both: ISO 200, f10, Auto SS.
X-T2 JPG 1-1 processed in camera
![](http://photos.morey.behrens.name/img/s5/v123/p849643481.png)
X-T2 RAF 1-1 LR Default Sharpening, Provia Camera Calibration profile
![](http://photos.morey.behrens.name/img/s11/v33/p680970891.png)
The LR processed image doesn't quite live up to the JPG but there is not a lot of difference. However the big difference is when we look at the X-T1 image below. This is what I am used to and the X-T2 images just seem soft compared to it. It is SOOC JPG.
![](http://photos.morey.behrens.name/img/s1/v48/p556692154.png)
The X-T1 JPG is significantly sharper and what I am used to getting consistently from the camera.
Is anyone else seeing this much of a difference between their X-T1 and X-T2 images?
I'm beginning to think I have a bad copy.