Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: rock - no trees, though  (Read 762 times)

Jeremy Roussak

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7155
rock - no trees, though
« on: November 07, 2015, 01:04:04 PM »

Thoughts?

Jeremy
Logged
(formerly kikashi)

Bruce Cox

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1076
    • flickr
Re: rock - no trees, though
« Reply #1 on: November 07, 2015, 02:09:55 PM »

The sense of scale, if not quietude, would be enhanced by some toy cars in the parking lot.
Logged

RSL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 11132
    • http://www.russ-lewis.com
Re: rock - no trees, though
« Reply #2 on: November 07, 2015, 02:47:27 PM »

Jeremy, those things in the lower right are what pass for trees in that part of the country.

Good shooting, by the way.

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 15321
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: rock - no trees, though
« Reply #3 on: November 07, 2015, 02:49:13 PM »

Very nice shot.

I strongly suspect it's not the Lake Country.   ;)
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12027
  • Following the masses? Be careful of the silent "m"
    • My website
Re: rock - no trees, though
« Reply #4 on: November 07, 2015, 03:06:41 PM »

The colors are nice, Jeremy, but something about composition bothers me. Central placement of the most interesting rock? Too much space around? I do not know. Strangely enough, central placement seems to work better in panoramic compositions, perhaps like this:

francois

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9621
Re: rock - no trees, though
« Reply #5 on: November 09, 2015, 07:23:50 AM »

Rich colors and wonderful light but I prefer Slobodan's version - without the foreground.
Logged
Francois

Jeremy Roussak

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7155
Re: rock - no trees, though
« Reply #6 on: November 10, 2015, 03:06:36 PM »

The colors are nice, Jeremy, but something about composition bothers me. Central placement of the most interesting rock? Too much space around? I do not know. Strangely enough, central placement seems to work better in panoramic compositions, perhaps like this:

I agree that removing the foreground improves it.

There's plenty to play with to the sides, as it happens: I didn't have enough time to change lenses, so I zoomed in as much as I could with my 24-105.

Jeremy
Logged
(formerly kikashi)

Jeremy Roussak

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7155
Re: rock - no trees, though
« Reply #7 on: November 10, 2015, 03:08:44 PM »

Very nice shot.

I strongly suspect it's not the Lake Country.   ;)

Thanks. And your suspicion that it's not the Lake District is, of course, spot on. I really should go there more often: it's a lot closer to me than Arizona.

Jeremy
Logged
(formerly kikashi)
Pages: [1]   Go Up