I made a lot of points in my post and you chose to ignore nearly all of them. Your only response to any of it indicates that you obviously didn't even read the article. It explains precisely how they'll solve that problem.
And, yes, it could well be at least partly coming from Labrador and Quebec. Electricity respects neither geographical nor temporal boundaries.
Peter, I was going to answer each of them. But you made so many diverse points, I just didn't have the time. Let me just say I disagree with them all.
1. Germany's renewables did not save them money. In fact they went up. What America pays and where we get our electricity from are a separate issue.
2. Lower prices are always better than higher prices. Otherwise farmers should sell their tractors and hire ten more farm workers for each and raise their food prices for people starving in the world, a wasteful proposition.
3. Sure taxes are helpful when needed. Unfortunately, government wastes a lot of money through inefficient processes. I personally know having worked for NYC government for 14 years in school construction. It's best to leave most things in private hands.
I did miss the battery storage inclusion in the first read-through. In any case, like I said, I'm all in favor of private decisions to build renewables. It's the government doing it I don;t trust.
