Luminous Landscape Home
Luminous Landscape Forum > The Art of Photography > User Critiques > latch
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: latch  (Read 547 times)

Jeremy Roussak

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8963
    • site
latch
« on: January 03, 2015, 01:33:55 pm »
Colour? Monochrome? Neither?

Jeremy
Logged

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18091
  • When everyone thinks the same, nobody thinks
    • My website
Re: latch
« Reply #1 on: January 03, 2015, 01:36:00 pm »
Both are good. I would do B&W much darker though.
Logged

Eric Myrvaagnes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 22813
  • http://myrvaagnes.com
    • http://myrvaagnes.com
Re: latch
« Reply #2 on: January 03, 2015, 05:17:51 pm »
I prefer the B&W, but I would also make it darker.
Logged
-Eric Myrvaagnes (visit my website: http://myrvaagnes.com)

francois

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 13797
Re: latch
« Reply #3 on: January 04, 2015, 07:33:52 am »
I also agree, B&W is best…
Logged
Francois

sarrasani

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 471
Re: latch
« Reply #4 on: February 05, 2015, 04:24:18 pm »
both good. I too prefer the b/w.
But for my tastes there is an excess of general and microcontrast, with too much (and a little artificial) detail extraction.
All the best,
sandro
Logged
Film cameras (13X18, 2,4X3,6), digital-foveon and digital-mosaic cameras.
Only manual focus lenses.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
Luminous Landscape Forum > The Art of Photography > User Critiques > latch