Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Muted  (Read 1283 times)

Richard Pearlman

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 175
Muted
« on: June 22, 2014, 08:51:36 am »

Comments and critiques are appreciated.

Slobodan Blagojevic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 18090
  • When everyone thinks the same, nobody thinks
    • My website
Re: Muted
« Reply #1 on: June 22, 2014, 10:13:04 am »

I am tempted to suggest to crop the horizon out, as the eye quickly skips the muted foreground and rushes to the strongest highlight in the picture, upper right.

Richard Pearlman

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 175
Re: Muted
« Reply #2 on: June 22, 2014, 01:31:11 pm »

I tried cropping it, but something feels wrong when I do.

Walt Roycraft

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 442
    • roycraftart
Re: Muted
« Reply #3 on: June 22, 2014, 08:10:21 pm »

Agree with Slobodon, crop out the horizon and you have a much stronger image.
Logged
Walter Roycraft
http://www.roycraftart.c

Richard Pearlman

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 175
Re: Muted
« Reply #4 on: June 22, 2014, 09:41:26 pm »

Thanks, Walt and Slobodan. Here is the cropped version.

Paulo Bizarro

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7395
    • http://www.paulobizarro.com
Re: Muted
« Reply #5 on: June 23, 2014, 03:43:29 am »

I prefer the original version, the cropped one just ends up being too drab/dull?

luxborealis

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2798
    • luxBorealis.com - photography by Terry McDonald
Re: Muted
« Reply #6 on: July 01, 2014, 12:06:41 am »

Why?

The discussion about whether or not to keep or crop the horizon has everything to do with why you photographed the scene in the first place. What was your goal? What were you trying to communicate?

Keeping the bright horizon accentuates the muted foreground. Yes, one's eye rushes to the brightest point, Slobodan, but then it "relaxes" and starts to wander through the rest of the photo.

Perhaps the "weakness" (if it can be called that) is that there isn't much in the rest of the photo to appreciate other than the replication of shape, tone and colour. But, if that's what you were after, Richard, then you've succeeded!
Logged
Terry McDonald - luxBorealis.com

stamper

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5882
Re: Muted
« Reply #7 on: July 01, 2014, 03:23:26 am »

I think there is a difference between muted and underexposed. Imo this is just underexposed. :(
Pages: [1]   Go Up