Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Least expensive way around Epson length limit  (Read 3301 times)

hugowolf

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1001
Least expensive way around Epson length limit
« on: February 14, 2014, 04:40:01 pm »

Is there a cheap RIP than can do this for the Epson 9890; I have no need of any aditional color management or layout tools, I just need to print 153 inches. (Win 7)

Brian A
Logged

aduke

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 446
Re: Least expensive way around Epson length limit
« Reply #1 on: February 14, 2014, 05:01:54 pm »

Take a look at QImage. It is not a RIP, but uses the Epson printer driver. It can, however, produce prints longer than the driver allows.

I've not used it in several years because I could get good results from LR easier and faster than with QImage.

Alan
Logged

BrianWJH

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 286
Re: Least expensive way around Epson length limit
« Reply #2 on: February 14, 2014, 05:10:12 pm »

Hi Brian, what about QImage currently $69.99.

Brian.
Logged

fike

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1413
  • Hiker Photographer
    • trailpixie.net
Least expensive way around Epson length limit
« Reply #3 on: February 14, 2014, 07:07:07 pm »

Qimags is excellent once you learn how to use it and it has allowed me to print very long images on person printers that had length limits.
Logged
Fike, Trailpixie, or Marc Shaffer

Ken Doo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1079
    • Carmel Fine Art Printing & Reproduction
Re: Least expensive way around Epson length limit
« Reply #4 on: February 14, 2014, 07:10:21 pm »

Another vote for Qimage Ultimate.

Great printer utility.  Besides large prints, Qimage also remembers all the printer settings for your different ICC profiles, tiles prints, a canvas shrinkage setting, and more.

ken

hugowolf

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1001
Re: Least expensive way around Epson length limit
« Reply #5 on: February 14, 2014, 07:51:43 pm »

Before Lightroom, I used QImage, but it isn't a RIP and I don't remember it getting around the 2^(16-1) pixel length limitation of the Epson drivers. Does it use some sorting of tiling to do this?

Brian A
Logged

Farmer

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2848
Re: Least expensive way around Epson length limit
« Reply #6 on: February 14, 2014, 09:28:05 pm »

Yes, tiling.

Hmmm, not often I see someone write 32768 in notation that takes 3 extra key strokes ;-)
Logged
Phil Brown

hugowolf

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1001
Re: Least expensive way around Epson length limit
« Reply #7 on: February 14, 2014, 09:55:58 pm »

Yes, tiling.

Hmmm, not often I see someone write 32768 in notation that takes 3 extra key strokes ;-)

Double math/art major, then computer CS grad.

Brian A
Logged

hugowolf

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1001
Re: Least expensive way around Epson length limit
« Reply #8 on: February 14, 2014, 09:58:14 pm »

So, is the QImage process somewhat automatic, or do I have to set up the tiling?

Brian A
Logged

Farmer

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2848
Re: Least expensive way around Epson length limit
« Reply #9 on: February 14, 2014, 10:12:21 pm »

Basically automatic - pretty sure you can download a demo to check it out.
Logged
Phil Brown

Ernst Dinkla

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4036
Re: Least expensive way around Epson length limit
« Reply #10 on: February 15, 2014, 04:33:05 am »

Qimage's manual content Learn by Example 6a tells you what has to be done. The printer driver has to have a banner mode to make it possible. So the 3800 and 3880 will not be compatible and any printer model with roll loading and banner mode is.

--
Met vriendelijke groet, Ernst

http://www.pigment-print.com/spectralplots/spectrumviz_1.htm
January 2014, 600+ inkjet media white spectral plots.
Logged

Andres Toodo

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9
Re: Least expensive way around Epson length limit
« Reply #11 on: February 15, 2014, 03:39:14 pm »

I can recommend Dinax Mirage. Excellent tool for the price. Dowload 14 day trial.
Logged

Farmer

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2848
Re: Least expensive way around Epson length limit
« Reply #12 on: February 15, 2014, 04:40:41 pm »

I can recommend Dinax Mirage. Excellent tool for the price. Dowload 14 day trial.

Another good option - very polished piece of software.
Logged
Phil Brown

hugowolf

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1001
Re: Least expensive way around Epson length limit
« Reply #13 on: February 15, 2014, 08:50:03 pm »

Another good option - very polished piece of software.

It looks very nice, but I am not seeing anything that QImage doesn't offer, except it has a UI, and QImage really doesn't. And $650.

Some Epson printers in European market are bundled with Mirage, and I would have gone with that if I was still living in Europe.

Brian A
Logged

Farmer

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2848
Re: Least expensive way around Epson length limit
« Reply #14 on: February 15, 2014, 08:59:29 pm »

The price is a huge difference, definitely.  The UI and the functionality, ease of use and so on are excellent but "least expensive" it's not.

It's also available for Mac, which may be interesting for some users.

It's quick, let's you create your own profiles (assuming you have the hardware), direct printing of various formats and so on.  But, yeah, it's not cheap :-)
Logged
Phil Brown

Bart_van_der_Wolf

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8919
Re: Least expensive way around Epson length limit
« Reply #15 on: February 15, 2014, 09:10:12 pm »

Hi,

Another vote for Qimage. Not only cheaper, but it also runs under Parallels or similar on Mac. And it's very powerful, has innovative resampling algorithms that will get the most out of the printer driver, and offers a no hassle, smart, halo free output sharpening (amongst many others, such as tone targeted sharpening, but also great nesting).
Did I mention the deceptively low price, and low cost upgrade regime?

Cheers,
Bart
Logged
== If you do what you did, you'll get what you got. ==

hugowolf

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1001
Re: Least expensive way around Epson length limit
« Reply #16 on: February 15, 2014, 10:57:33 pm »

As things are going, I will probably end up buying QImage again. I just wish Mike Chaney would hire a UI designer and programmer for a few months to sort out the interface.

Brian A
Logged

signinchina

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8
Re: Least expensive way around Epson length limit
« Reply #17 on: February 18, 2014, 12:27:58 am »

I vote for Qimage Ultimate,I used it before.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up