I for one, am an exception to the generalisation that everyone has a DSLR system as well. I do NOT own a DSLR, nor do I intend to get one, most certainly not to shoot work for my clients. My needs, and those of my clients, are currently fully met by my MF system, based around an IQ180 and a P45+ back on DF, Fuji GX680II and ALPA STC systems. Yes, I do own a 4/3 system as well, but it's purely my happy-snap toy. For this reason, I do follow very closely any new developments in MF-land. For the moment, the IQ250 has no interest for me, primarily because I will not sacrifice the angle of view I currently have with my favourite combo of the 23HR on the IQ180. I do, however, find the opportunities offered by having better LV and high ISO very exciting. When I can have it in a full-size sensor that works with a tech cam, then that will be my Holy Grail. The nature of my work and my clients makes me very much an outlier, or as a friend of mine describes me, an edge walker, so I don't think my criteria reflect the larger part of the market. I think this back will suit a great many shooters and will do very well. It also remains to be seen what the prematurely announced and one-day-to-be-delivered (Sorry Hasselblad, your over-promise and under deliver history, as manifested by your 60MP back launch, among others, remains a red flag) is going to deliver. I'm sure it's going to be a capable device also. Given that P1 still have to show us their new body (PLEASE!), and Blad are openly saying they have more to come soon, it's shaping up to be a big year. Reports of the demise of MF seem to be greatly exaggerated.